> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2023 3:07 AM
> To: Ivan Malov <[email protected]>; Simon Horman
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Eli Britstein
> <[email protected]>; Kevin Liu <[email protected]>; Chaoyong He
> <[email protected]>; oss-drivers <[email protected]>; Nole
> Zhang <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH dpdk-latest v4 1/5] netdev-dpdk: use flow
> transfer proxy
> 
> On 5/3/23 16:00, Ivan Malov wrote:
> > Hello Simon,
> >
> > This patch has me intrigued. By the looks of it, it bears uncanny
> > resemblance to patch [1] by another author. Is your patch based on
> > patch [1]? If yes, could you please comment on the following:
> >
> > 1) Your patch does not seem to reference the original author.
> >    Why is it so? Is there a problem, colleagues?
> 
> When re-using someone else's work, please, retain the original authorship.  I
> see there are changes made to the patch, but it's the same as the original in
> many parts.  Since you made changes, you should add yourself as co-authors.
> If you feel that changes made are more significant than the original ptch,
> then you may swap the authorship, but you should add the original author to
> the list of co-authors anyway.

@Ivan Malov sorry again.
It is my fault, I'm very sorry for these.
Next version, I will add signed-by.
> 
> >
> > 2) Your patch does not seem to address review feedback [2].
> >    There's a problem that has been indicated by Eli,
> >    regarding flow flush. Doesn't it still stand?
> 
> In this version the rte_flow_flush() call is added instead of failing the 
> detach.
> However,
> 
> a. the flush operation should have already been executed from
>    the higher layer from do_del_port() in dpif-netdev.  So,
>    it should not be needed.
> 
> b. The problem doesn't apper to be addressed, because related
>    ports will not get their flows flushed.

Ok, I think you are right, do you think if I use the  rte_flow_flush() for 
related ports is OK?

> 
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> 
> >
> > Interested to hear your input on this. Thank you.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2023-February/402152.ht
> > ml
> >
> > [2]
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2023-February/402172.ht
> > ml
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to