On 5/9/23 16:29, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> When doing performance testing with OVS v3.1 we ran into a deadlock
> situation with the netdev_hmap_rwlock read/write lock. After some
> debugging, it was discovered that the netdev_hmap_rwlock read lock
> was taken recursively. And well in the folowing sequence of events:
> 
>  netdev_ports_flow_get()
>    It takes the read lock, while it walks all the ports
>    in the port_to_netdev hmap and calls:
>    - netdev_flow_get() which will call:
>      - netdev_tc_flow_get() which will call:
>        - netdev_ifindex_to_odp_port()
>           This function also takes the same read lock to
>           walk the ifindex_to_port hmap.
> 
> In OVS a read/write lock does not support recursive readers. For details
> see the comments in ovs-thread.h. If you do this, it will lock up,
> mainly due to OVS setting the PTHREAD_RWLOCK_PREFER_WRITER_NONRECURSIVE_NP
> attribute to the lock.
> 
> The solution with this patch is to use two separate read/write
> locks, with an order guarantee to avoid another potential deadlock.
> 
> Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182541
> Fixes: 9fe21a4fc12a ("netdev-offload: replace netdev_hmap_mutex to 
> netdev_hmap_rwlock")
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> v2: Renamed locks to be more meaningful.
> 
>  lib/netdev-offload.c |   70 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-offload.c b/lib/netdev-offload.c
> index 4592262bd..293864c51 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-offload.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-offload.c
> @@ -485,11 +485,13 @@ netdev_set_hw_info(struct netdev *netdev, int type, int 
> val)
>  }
>  
>  /* Protects below port hashmaps. */
> -static struct ovs_rwlock netdev_hmap_rwlock = OVS_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> +static struct ovs_rwlock ifindex_to_port_rwlock = OVS_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> +static struct ovs_rwlock port_to_netdev_rwlock \

We shouldn't add line continuations to a normal C code.

> +    OVS_ACQ_BEFORE(ifindex_to_port_rwlock) = OVS_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;

Thanks for v3!  I removed the '\' above and applied the patch.
Also backported down to 2.17.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to