Simon Horman <simon.hor...@corigine.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 11:09:58AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> >> We moved the per cpu upcall counter allocation to the existing vport
>> >> alloc and free functions to solve this.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: 95637d91fefd ("net: openvswitch: release vport resources on
>> >> failure")
>> >> Fixes: 1933ea365aa7 ("net: openvswitch: Add support to count upcall
>> >> packets")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com>
>> >> ---
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
>>
>> Were you intentionally ACKing this on Aaron’s behalf? Or just a cut/paste
>> error ;)
>
> I was wondering that too.
> But then I concluded it was an artifact of top-posting or some
> other behaviour of the mail client.
Thankfully, I did ack the patch, but yes, this is something to be
careful.
To wangchuanlei <wangchuan...@inspur.com>, please read
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/
Specifically, do not top-post for this and other reasons.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
