Hi Ilya,
Thank you for your advice. 😁
Can I take 2 minutes off of your time? 😉
Does this command work correctly? I usually use this command to send
patches.
"git send-email --to [email protected] --cover-letter --annotate -v6 -4"
Best regards, Lin Huang.
On 6/29/2023 10:51 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 6/18/23 15:58, [email protected] wrote:
From: Lin Huang <[email protected]>
v5->v4: police pkts bps and pps at the same time.
Get the maximum from the number of dropped packets, and drop that.
v4->v3: rewrite egress_policer_details_to_param func.
add a new pkts_policer_profile_config func.
v2->v3: police and free pkts by bulk.
fix the appropriate error code.
v1->v2: delete duplicated code.
Lin Huang (4):
token-bucket: Make token-bucket timestamp updated by caller.
netdev-dpdk: make srtcm_policer not to free pkts.
netdev-dpdk: Add support for egress packet-per-second policing.
netdev-dpdk: Add support for ingress packet-per-second policing.
Documentation/topics/dpdk/qos.rst | 29 +-
NEWS | 5 +
include/openvswitch/token-bucket.h | 3 +-
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 233 ++++++++++++----
lib/token-bucket.c | 4 +-
lib/vlog.c | 3 +-
ofproto/pinsched.c | 2 +-
tests/system-dpdk.at | 412 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
vswitchd/vswitch.xml | 10 +
9 files changed, 641 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
Thanks for v5! I tried this version and it seems to work fine.
I posted a few small comments for the code. Please, address them
and send a new version.
BTW, v5 was sent in a strange way with patches sent in reply to
some wrong ones. Please, send v6 without in-reply-to header.
Patches should generally be sent as replies to a cover letter,
but the cover letter itself should be a standalone message without
in-reply-to header.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
