On Mon, Jul 31, 2023, 8:29 PM Han Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:38 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Numan Siddique <[email protected]>
> >
> > This patch series adds the support to handle load balancer and
> > load balancer group changes incrementally in the "northd" engine
> > node.  "flow" engine node doesn't support I-P yet and falls back
> > to full recompute.  Changes to logical switches and router's load
> > balancer and load balancer group columns are also handled incrementally
> > provided those are the only changes to them.
> >
> > Below are the scale testing results done with these patches applied
> > using ovn-heater.  The test ran the scenario  -
> > ocp-500-density-heavy.yml [1].
> >
> > With these patches applied (with load balancer I-P handling in northd
> > engine node) the resuts are:
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                         Min (s)         Median (s)      90%ile (s)
>  99%ile (s)      Max (s)         Mean (s)        Total (s)       Count
> Failed
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Iteration Total         0.132929        2.157103        3.314847
>  3.331561        4.378626        1.581889        197.736147      125     0
> > Namespace.add_ports     0.005217        0.005760        0.006565
>  0.013348        0.021014        0.006106        0.763214        125     0
> > WorkerNode.bind_port    0.035205        0.045458        0.052278
>  0.059804        0.063941        0.045652        11.413122       250     0
> > WorkerNode.ping_port    0.005075        0.006814        3.088548
>  3.192577        4.242026        0.726453        181.613284      250     0
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > The results with the present main are:
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                         Min (s)         Median (s)      90%ile (s)
>  99%ile (s)      Max (s)         Mean (s)        Total (s)       Count
> Failed
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Iteration Total         4.377260        6.486962        7.502040
>  8.322587        8.334701        6.559002        819.875306      125     0
> > Namespace.add_ports     0.005112        0.005484        0.005953
>  0.009153        0.011452        0.005662        0.707752        125     0
> > WorkerNode.bind_port    0.035360        0.042732        0.049152
>  0.053698        0.056635        0.043215        10.803700       250     0
> > WorkerNode.ping_port    0.005338        1.599904        7.229649
>  7.798039        8.206537        3.209860        802.464911      250     0
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Few observations:
> >
> >  - The total time taken has come down significantly from 819 seconds to
> 197
> >    to complete the density heavy tests (excluding the base cluster
> >    bringup)
> >  - 99%ile with these patches is 3.3 seconds compared to 8.3 seconds for
> the
> >    main.
> >  - 90%file with these patches is 3.3 seconds compared to 7.5 seconds for
> >    the main.
> >  - CPU utilization of northd during the test with these patches
> >    is between 100% to 300% which is almost the same as main.
> >    Main difference being that, with these patches the test duration is
> >    less and hence overall less CPU utilization.
> >
>
> Thanks Numan for the revision and I'm so glad to see the performance
> improvements! I should find the details in the patches but it would be
> helpful if you could briefly summarize the changes of v3, especially the
> ones that fix the performance regressions of v2 reported by Ilya
>


Sure.  Also I'll be submitting v4 shortly which has more test cases and a
few bug fixes. So please hold on to your reviews.

Regards,
> Han
>
> > [1] -
>
> https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-heater/blob/main/test-scenarios/ocp-500-density-heavy.yml
> >
> >
> > Numan Siddique (8):
> >   northd I-P: Sync SB load balancers in a separate engine node.
> >   northd: Add a new engine node - lb_data.
> >   northd: Add initial I-P for load balancer and load balancer groups
> >   northd: Refactor the 'northd' node code which handles logical switch
> >     changes.
> >   northd: Handle load balancer changes for a logical switch.
> >   northd: Handle load balancer group changes for a logical switch.
> >   northd: Sync SB Port bindings NAT column in a separate engine node.
> >   northd: Handle load balancer/group changes for a logical router.
> >
> >  lib/lb.c                 |  286 +++++--
> >  lib/lb.h                 |   94 ++-
> >  northd/automake.mk       |    2 +
> >  northd/en-lb-data.c      |  745 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  northd/en-lb-data.h      |   94 +++
> >  northd/en-lflow.c        |    9 +-
> >  northd/en-northd.c       |  119 ++-
> >  northd/en-northd.h       |    3 +
> >  northd/en-sync-sb.c      |   74 ++
> >  northd/en-sync-sb.h      |   10 +
> >  northd/inc-proc-northd.c |   32 +-
> >  northd/northd.c          | 1566 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  northd/northd.h          |   39 +-
> >  tests/ovn-northd.at      |  261 +++++++
> >  14 files changed, 2704 insertions(+), 630 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 northd/en-lb-data.c
> >  create mode 100644 northd/en-lb-data.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.40.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to