Using "NXM/OXM Support" makes these tables a little too wide to fit well when rendered in 80 columns, causing warnings from groff. There's already some abbreviation going on here (e.g. "RW?"), so "NXM/OXM?" seems acceptable.
Reported-by: Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> Reported-at: https://bugs.debian.org/1042358 Signed-off-by: Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> --- build-aux/extract-ofp-fields | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/build-aux/extract-ofp-fields b/build-aux/extract-ofp-fields index 2f566d2b9..808c6527d 100755 --- a/build-aux/extract-ofp-fields +++ b/build-aux/extract-ofp-fields @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ def group_xml_to_nroff(group_node, fields): ".TS\n", "tab(;);\n", "l l l l l l l.\n", - "Name;Bytes;Mask;RW?;Prereqs;NXM/OXM Support\n", + "Name;Bytes;Mask;RW?;Prereqs;NXM/OXM?\n", "\_;\_;\_;\_;\_;\_\n", ] content += summary -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
