On 24 Aug 2023, at 8:56, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:35 PM David Marchand > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Integrate system-traffic.at tests as part of check-dpdk. > > CI (thinking of Intel robot) other than GHA might not be too happy > about this change. > It is hard to tell what fails in the report I received. > > A safer approach is probably to define a new check-XXX target instead > of expanding check-dpdk. To be honest, I think we already have too many tests, so I would not mind keeping it in one test and see if intel can make reporting better (maybe store the results somewhere). I added the system-traffic.at a while back to the offload tests (and no one complained :). //Eelco PS: Will review the full series later this week. >> >> DPDK net/tap specific logs are added to the log exclusions. >> >> Some tests that can't work with the userspace datapath are skipped by >> overriding some OVS_CHECK_* macros. >> >> ADD_VETH is implemented with a tap interface in the kernel, directly >> polled by OVS. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]> > > > -- > David Marchand _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
