On 10/17/23 15:49, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> This patch fixes two 'Dead assignment' warnings, where the one in
> count_common_prefix_run() is actually a bug where the set is in reverse order.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  lib/ofp-monitor.c |    5 ++---
>  lib/ofp-table.c   |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/ofp-monitor.c b/lib/ofp-monitor.c
> index c27733a52..aed5f0497 100644
> --- a/lib/ofp-monitor.c
> +++ b/lib/ofp-monitor.c
> @@ -962,13 +962,12 @@ ofputil_decode_flow_update(struct ofputil_flow_update 
> *update,
>              return 0;
>          } else if (update->event == OFPFME_PAUSED
>                     || update->event == OFPFME_RESUMED) {
> -            struct ofp_flow_update_paused *ofup;
>  
> -            if (length != sizeof *ofup) {
> +            if (length != sizeof(struct ofp_flow_update_paused)) {
>                  goto bad_len;
>              }
>  
> -            ofup = ofpbuf_pull(msg, sizeof *ofup);
> +            ofpbuf_pull(msg, sizeof(struct ofp_flow_update_paused));

Hmm.  I find the previous code a little bit more readable.
Maybe we can just silence the warning with OVS_UNUSED since
this variable is indeed not used?  What do you think?

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to