On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 7:09 AM Ales Musil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 3:58 PM Xavier Simonart <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > When a logical switch port was deleted and added back quickly, it could
> > happen that the lsp was never reported up
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <[email protected]>
> >
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> I have one small nit below which could be addressed during merge if others
> agree.
>
> ---
> >  northd/northd.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> >  tests/ovn.at    | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c
> > index f8b046d83..0bea3bf2c 100644
> > --- a/northd/northd.c
> > +++ b/northd/northd.c
> > @@ -5192,11 +5192,16 @@ ls_port_has_changed(const struct
> > nbrec_logical_switch_port *old,
> >  }
> >
> >  static struct ovn_port *
> > -ovn_port_find_in_datapath(struct ovn_datapath *od, const char *name)
> > +ovn_port_find_in_datapath(struct ovn_datapath *od, const char *name,
> > +                          const struct uuid uuid)
> >  {
> >      struct ovn_port *op;
> >      HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH (op, dp_node, hash_string(name, 0),
> > &od->ports) {
> >          if (!strcmp(op->key, name)) {
> > +            if (op->nbsp && memcmp(&op->nbsp->header_.uuid, &uuid,
> > +                sizeof(uuid))) {
> >
>
> nit: There is uuid_equals() which we should use.
>

Hi Xavier,

Thanks for the patch.

If a logical switch has lots of logical ports,  we would end up
calling "memcmp" for all of them which could be costly.
But using uuid_equals()  should be fine.

I think we can simplify the code a bit since op->nbsp and new_nbsp
pointers would be different if a logical port was deleted
and re-added.  I think we can just compare op->nbsp == new_nbsp here.

Does the below diff look good to you ?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c
index c043393860..3aa48ab074 100644
--- a/northd/northd.c
+++ b/northd/northd.c
@@ -5180,28 +5180,20 @@ lsp_can_be_inc_processed(const struct
nbrec_logical_switch_port *nbsp)
 }

 static bool
-ls_port_has_changed(const struct nbrec_logical_switch_port *old,
-                    const struct nbrec_logical_switch_port *new)
+ls_port_has_changed(const struct nbrec_logical_switch_port *new)
 {
-    if (old != new) {
-        return true;
-    }
     /* XXX: Need a better OVSDB IDL interface for this check. */
     return (nbrec_logical_switch_port_row_get_seqno(new,
                                 OVSDB_IDL_CHANGE_MODIFY) > 0);
 }

 static struct ovn_port *
-ovn_port_find_in_datapath(struct ovn_datapath *od, const char *name,
-                          const struct uuid uuid)
+ovn_port_find_in_datapath(struct ovn_datapath *od,
+                          const struct nbrec_logical_switch_port *nbsp)
 {
     struct ovn_port *op;
-    HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH (op, dp_node, hash_string(name, 0), &od->ports) {
-        if (!strcmp(op->key, name)) {
-            if (op->nbsp && memcmp(&op->nbsp->header_.uuid, &uuid,
-                sizeof(uuid))) {
-                continue;
-            }
+    HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH (op, dp_node, hash_string(nbsp->name, 0),
+                             &od->ports) {
+        if (!strcmp(op->key, nbsp->name) && op->nbsp == nbsp) {
             return op;
         }
     }
@@ -5386,8 +5378,8 @@ ls_handle_lsp_changes(struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnsb_idl_txn,
     /* Compare the individual ports in the old and new Logical Switches */
     for (size_t j = 0; j < changed_ls->n_ports; ++j) {
         struct nbrec_logical_switch_port *new_nbsp = changed_ls->ports[j];
-        op = ovn_port_find_in_datapath(od, new_nbsp->name,
-                                       new_nbsp->header_.uuid);
+        op = ovn_port_find_in_datapath(od, new_nbsp);
+
         if (!op) {
             if (!lsp_can_be_inc_processed(new_nbsp)) {
                 goto fail;
@@ -5403,7 +5395,7 @@ ls_handle_lsp_changes(struct ovsdb_idl_txn *ovnsb_idl_txn,
             }
             ovs_list_push_back(&ls_change->added_ports,
                                 &op->list);
-        } else if (ls_port_has_changed(op->nbsp, new_nbsp)) {
+        } else if (ls_port_has_changed(new_nbsp)) {
             /* Existing port updated */
             bool temp = false;
             if (lsp_is_type_changed(op->sb, new_nbsp, &temp) ||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>
> > +                continue;
> > +            }
> >              return op;
> >          }
> >      }
> > @@ -5381,8 +5386,8 @@ ls_handle_lsp_changes(struct ovsdb_idl_txn
> > *ovnsb_idl_txn,
> >      /* Compare the individual ports in the old and new Logical Switches */
> >      for (size_t j = 0; j < changed_ls->n_ports; ++j) {
> >          struct nbrec_logical_switch_port *new_nbsp = changed_ls->ports[j];
> > -        op = ovn_port_find_in_datapath(od, new_nbsp->name);
> > -
> > +        op = ovn_port_find_in_datapath(od, new_nbsp->name,
> > +                                       new_nbsp->header_.uuid);
> >          if (!op) {
> >              if (!lsp_can_be_inc_processed(new_nbsp)) {
> >                  goto fail;
> > @@ -5671,9 +5676,9 @@ northd_handle_sb_port_binding_changes(
> >               * notification of that transaction, and we can ignore in this
> >               * case. Fallback to recompute otherwise, to avoid dangling
> >               * sb idl pointers and other unexpected behavior. */
> > -            if (op) {
> > -                VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "A port-binding for %s is deleted but
> > the "
> > -                            "LSP still exists.", pb->logical_port);
> > +            if (op && op->sb == pb) {
> > +                VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "A port-binding for %s is deleted but "
> > +                            "the LSP still exists.", pb->logical_port);
> >                  return false;
> >              }
> >          } else {
> > diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
> > index 637d92bed..cfd39a918 100644
> > --- a/tests/ovn.at
> > +++ b/tests/ovn.at
> > @@ -36957,3 +36957,48 @@ AT_CHECK([grep -c "NXT_CT_FLUSH_ZONE"
> > hv1/ovs-vswitchd.log], [0], [dnl
> >  OVN_CLEANUP([hv1])
> >  AT_CLEANUP
> >  ])
> > +
> > +OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD_NO_HV([
> > +AT_SETUP([port up with slow northd])
> > +ovn_start
> > +
> > +sleep_northd() {
> > +  echo northd going to sleep
> > +  AT_CHECK([kill -STOP $(cat northd/ovn-northd.pid)])
> > +}
> > +

I think these functions - sleep_northd and wake_up_northd can be in
tests/ovn-common.at.

This patch 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/
 does that.

You don't have to submit v2 for this.  I can take care of it before merging,

Please let me know if the diff I shared above looks good to you ?

Thanks
Numan

> > +wake_up_northd() {
> > +  echo northd going to sleep
> > +  AT_CHECK([kill -CONT $(cat northd/ovn-northd.pid)])
> > +}
> > +
> > +net_add n1
> > +sim_add hv1
> > +as hv1
> > +ovs-vsctl add-br br-phys
> > +ovn_attach n1 br-phys 192.168.0.11
> > +
> > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv ls-add ls0
> > +# Create a pilot port and wait it up to make sure we are ready for the
> > real
> > +# tests, so that the counters measured are accurate.
> > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv lsp-add ls0 lsp-pilot -- lsp-set-addresses
> > lsp-pilot "unknown"
> > +ovs-vsctl add-port br-int lsp-pilot -- set interface lsp-pilot
> > external_ids:iface-id=lsp-pilot
> > +wait_for_ports_up
> > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
> > +
> > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv lsp-add ls0 lsp0-2 -- lsp-set-addresses lsp0-2
> > "aa:aa:aa:00:00:02 192.168.0.12"
> > +ovs-vsctl add-port br-int lsp0-2 -- set interface lsp0-2
> > external_ids:iface-id=lsp0-2
> > +wait_for_ports_up
> > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
> > +
> > +sleep_northd
> > +check ovn-nbctl lsp-del lsp0-2
> > +check ovn-nbctl lsp-add ls0 lsp0-2 -- lsp-set-addresses lsp0-2
> > "aa:aa:aa:00:00:02 192.168.0.12"
> > +wake_up_northd
> > +
> > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb sync
> > +wait_for_ports_up
> > +
> > +OVN_CLEANUP([hv1])
> > +AT_CLEANUP
> > +])
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> >
> >
> Other than that it looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks,
> Ales
>
> --
>
> Ales Musil
>
> Senior Software Engineer - OVN Core
>
> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> [email protected]
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to