On 11/23/23 13:38, Ales Musil wrote:
> Add note that one the patches after branching should
> pin the container to the current LTS version so the
> CI on that branch remains stable as long as possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ales Musil <amu...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/internals/release-process.rst | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst 
> b/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst
> index ec79fe48c..26d3f8d4d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst
> @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ Scheduling`_ for the timing of each stage:
>     branch.  Features to be added to release branches should be limited in 
> scope
>     and risk and discussed on ovs-dev before creating the branch.
>  
> +   In order to keep the CI stable on the new release branch, the Ubuntu
> +   container should be pinned to the current LTS version in the Dockerfile
> +   e.g. registry.hub.docker.com/library/ubuntu:22.04.
> +

Should we already move stable branches to ubuntu:22.04?

Regardless:

Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>

>  3. When committers come to rough consensus that the release is ready, they
>     release the .0 release on its branch, e.g. 25.09.0 for branch-25.09.  To
>     make the actual release, a committer pushes a signed tag named, e.g.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to