On 11/23/23 13:38, Ales Musil wrote: > Add note that one the patches after branching should > pin the container to the current LTS version so the > CI on that branch remains stable as long as possible. > > Signed-off-by: Ales Musil <amu...@redhat.com> > --- > Documentation/internals/release-process.rst | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst > b/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst > index ec79fe48c..26d3f8d4d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst > +++ b/Documentation/internals/release-process.rst > @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ Scheduling`_ for the timing of each stage: > branch. Features to be added to release branches should be limited in > scope > and risk and discussed on ovs-dev before creating the branch. > > + In order to keep the CI stable on the new release branch, the Ubuntu > + container should be pinned to the current LTS version in the Dockerfile > + e.g. registry.hub.docker.com/library/ubuntu:22.04. > +
Should we already move stable branches to ubuntu:22.04? Regardless: Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com> > 3. When committers come to rough consensus that the release is ready, they > release the .0 release on its branch, e.g. 25.09.0 for branch-25.09. To > make the actual release, a committer pushes a signed tag named, e.g. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev