On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:54:03PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 1/12/24 11:44, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >> Small refactoring so we can re-use this function in later commits.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
> >> index 7f65cadfe..7e95b3813 100644
> >> --- a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
> >> +++ b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
> >> @@ -316,6 +316,34 @@ main_loop(struct server_config *config,
> >>      free(remotes_error);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +/* Parsing the relay in format 'relay:DB_NAME:<list of remotes>'.
> >> + * On success, returns 'true', 'name' is set to DB_NAME, 'remotes' to
> >> + * '<list of remotes>'.  Caller is responsible of freeing 'name' and
> >> + * 'remotes'.  On failure, returns 'false'.  */
> >> +static bool
> >> +parse_relay_args(const char *arg, char **name, char **remote)
> >> +{
> >> +    const char *relay_prefix = "relay:";
> >> +    const int relay_prefix_len = strlen(relay_prefix);
> >> +    bool is_relay;
> >> +
> >> +    is_relay = !strncmp(arg, relay_prefix, relay_prefix_len);
> >> +    if (!is_relay) {
> >> +        return false;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    *remote = strchr(arg + relay_prefix_len, ':');
> >> +
> >> +    if (!*remote || (*remote)[0] == '\0') {
> >> +        *remote = NULL;
> >> +        return false;
> > 
> > Hi Ilya,
> > 
> > Prior to this patch this condition would cause open_db()
> > to return an "invalid syntax" error message. Now it
> > will cause the (!is_relay) branch to be taken in open_db().
> > 
> > Is this intended?
> 
> It's a side effect of extracting the function.  But I'm not sure
> if it is a big deal.  The condition here is that someone is trying
> to open a database named 'relay:'.  They likely do not have a file
> named like that, so they will get a slightly different error while
> trying to open it.  Should be clear enough for a user, I hope.
> 
> What do you think?

Thanks for the clarification, this seems fine to me.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to