On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 5:27 PM Xavier Simonart <[email protected]> wrote:

> The test was confused as 192.168.0.1 was configured for DR-S3 port
> (configured as a gateway-chassis hv4) as well as the encap_ip for hv1.
>
> Hence packets which were supposed to be sent towards hv1 got sent
> to hv4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tests/ovn.at | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
> index 902dd3793..7cf4d02d3 100644
> --- a/tests/ovn.at
> +++ b/tests/ovn.at
> @@ -33322,7 +33322,7 @@ for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do
>      as hv$i
>      ovs-vsctl add-br br-phys
>      ovs-vsctl set open . external-ids:ovn-bridge-mappings=phys:br-phys
> -    ovn_attach n1 br-phys 192.168.0.$i 24 $encap
> +    ovn_attach n1 br-phys 192.168.1.$i 24 $encap
>  done
>
>  # Add a vif on HV1
> --
> 2.41.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
>
Looks good to me, thanks.

Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]>

-- 

Ales Musil

Senior Software Engineer - OVN Core

Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com>

[email protected]
<https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to