On 2/13/24 02:15, Ales Musil wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 5:27 PM Xavier Simonart <[email protected]> wrote:
The test was confused as 192.168.0.1 was configured for DR-S3 port
(configured as a gateway-chassis hv4) as well as the encap_ip for hv1.
Hence packets which were supposed to be sent towards hv1 got sent
to hv4.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <[email protected]>
---
tests/ovn.at | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
index 902dd3793..7cf4d02d3 100644
--- a/tests/ovn.at
+++ b/tests/ovn.at
@@ -33322,7 +33322,7 @@ for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do
as hv$i
ovs-vsctl add-br br-phys
ovs-vsctl set open . external-ids:ovn-bridge-mappings=phys:br-phys
- ovn_attach n1 br-phys 192.168.0.$i 24 $encap
+ ovn_attach n1 br-phys 192.168.1.$i 24 $encap
done
# Add a vif on HV1
--
2.41.0
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Looks good to me, thanks.
Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]>
Thanks Xavier and Ales. I pushed this to main, 24.03, 23.09, and 23.06.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
