Oh, my bad. I’ll send out v3.
Sorry.

> On 4 Apr 2024, at 19:53, Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4/4/24 18:06, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
>> Commit [1] introduced a "vxlan mode" concept.  It brought a limitation
>> for available tunnel IDs because of lack of space in VXLAN VNI.
>> In vxlan mode OVN is limited by 4095 datapaths (LRs or non-transit LSs)
>> and 2047 logical switch ports per datapath.
>> 
>> Prior to this patch vxlan mode was enabled automatically if at least one
>> chassis had encap of vxlan type.  In scenarios where one want to use VXLAN
>> only for HW VTEP (RAMP) switch, such limitation makes no sence.
>> 
>> This patch adds support for explicit disabling of vxlan mode via
>> Northbound database.
>> 
>> 1: https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/commit/b07f1bc3d068
>> 
>> CC: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com>
>> Fixes: b07f1bc3d068 ("Add VXLAN support for non-VTEP datapath bindings")
>> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Odintsov <odiv...@gmail.com>
>> ---
> 
> 
>> diff --git a/ovs b/ovs
>> index fe55ce37a..94191b7a4 160000
>> --- a/ovs
>> +++ b/ovs
>> @@ -1 +1 @@
>> -Subproject commit fe55ce37a7b090d09dee5c01ae0797320ad678f6
>> +Subproject commit 94191b7a4926204510931770c52992c9ea24d4e2
> 
> Looks like you included a submodule change by accident.  This causes the
> CI to fail:
> https://github.com/ovsrobot/ovn/actions/runs/8557944614
> 
> Regards,
> Dumitru


Regards,
Vladislav Odintsov

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to