On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 11:59:02AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 11:57:46AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:16:31PM -0700, William Tu via dev wrote: > > > Add route-table that support ipv4 dst via ipv6. BGP unnumbered is > > > mechanism > > > that allows BGP to establish peering sessions without the need to > > > explicitly > > > configure IP addresses on the interfaces involved in the peering. Without > > > using IP address assignments, it uses link-local IPv6 addresses of the > > > directly connected neighbors for peering purposes. For example, BGP > > > might install the following route: > > > $ ip route get 100.87.18.3 > > > 100.87.18.3 via inet6 fe80::920a:84ff:fe9e:9570 dev br-phy src > > > 100.87.18.6 > > > > > > Currently OVS can only support either all-ipv4 or all-ipv6, the patch > > > adds support for such use case. > > > > > > Reported-at: > > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2024-January/052908.html > > > Signed-off-by: William Tu <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> > > Just to clarify: this patch looks good to me. > But I suggest resubmit it as a non-RFC when you are ready.
The comments above were supposed to be responses to v2. Oops. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
