On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:49 PM Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> wrote:
> The wording above is not completely clear without these scenarios > listed. A confused reader may incorrectly read it as: > > ``` > Only LTS-to-LTS is supported for rolling upgrades. > ``` > > which is wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/intro/install/ovn-upgrades.rst | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/ovn-upgrades.rst > b/Documentation/intro/install/ovn-upgrades.rst > index 1f99a86ec..f3dea07dc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/intro/install/ovn-upgrades.rst > +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/ovn-upgrades.rst > @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ To avoid buildup of complexity and technical debt we > limit the span of versions > supported for a rolling upgrade on :ref:`long-term-support` (LTS), and it > should always be possible to upgrade from the previous LTS version to the > next. > > +The following rolling upgrade paths are supported: > + > +1. LTS to the very next LTS release, or to any non-LTS in between the two. > +2. Any non-LTS to the very next LTS release. > + > The first LTS version of OVN was 22.03. If you want to upgrade between > other > versions, you can use the `Fail-safe upgrade`_ procedure. > > -- > 2.41.0 > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev > > Looks good to me, thanks. Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]> -- Ales Musil Senior Software Engineer - OVN Core Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com> [email protected] <https://red.ht/sig> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
