On 27/05/2024 23:28, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/23/24 18:00, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> Update the CI and docs to use DPDK 23.11.1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  .github/workflows/build-and-test.yml |  4 ++--
>>  Documentation/faq/releases.rst       | 10 +++++-----
>>  Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst |  8 ++++----
>>  NEWS                                 |  3 +++
>>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml 
>> b/.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml
>> index 44491db3e..4a012efd9 100644
>> --- a/.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml
>> +++ b/.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml
>> @@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ jobs:
>>        dependencies: gcc libbpf-dev libnuma-dev libpcap-dev ninja-build 
>> pkgconf
>>        CC: gcc
>> -      DPDK_GIT: https://dpdk.org/git/dpdk
>> -      DPDK_VER: 23.11
>> +      DPDK_GIT: https://dpdk.org/git/dpdk-stable
>> +      DPDK_VER: 23.11.1
>>      name: dpdk gcc
>>      outputs:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst
>> index 49b987b61..95ce0bf41 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst
>> @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ Q: What DPDK version does each Open vSwitch release work 
>> with?
>>      2.15.x       20.11.6
>>      2.16.x       20.11.6
>> -    2.17.x       21.11.6
>> -    3.0.x        21.11.6
>> -    3.1.x        22.11.4
>> -    3.2.x        22.11.4
>> -    3.3.x        23.11
>> +    2.17.x       21.11.7
>> +    3.0.x        21.11.7
>> +    3.1.x        22.11.5
>> +    3.2.x        22.11.5
>> +    3.3.x        23.11.1
>>      ============ ========
>>  
>> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst 
>> b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
>> index ad9bdf22c..93c4a12e7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
>> @@ -43,5 +43,5 @@ In addition to the requirements described in 
>> :doc:`general`, building Open
>>  vSwitch with DPDK will require the following:
>>  
>> -- DPDK 23.11
>> +- DPDK 23.11.1
>>  
>>  - A `DPDK supported NIC`_
>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Install DPDK
>>  
>>         $ cd /usr/src/
>> -       $ wget https://fast.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-23.11.tar.xz
>> -       $ tar xf dpdk-23.11.tar.xz
>> -       $ export DPDK_DIR=/usr/src/dpdk-23.11
>> +       $ wget https://fast.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-23.11.1.tar.xz
>> +       $ tar xf dpdk-23.11.1.tar.xz
>> +       $ export DPDK_DIR=/usr/src/dpdk-stable-23.11.1
>>         $ cd $DPDK_DIR
>>  
>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
>> index 4bfb341cf..1c93d2944 100644
>> --- a/NEWS
>> +++ b/NEWS
>> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
>>  v3.3.1 - xx xxx xxxx
>>  --------------------
>> +   - DPDK:
>> +     * Add support for DPDK 23.11.1.
>> +
> 
> We're normally using 'validated with'.

Yeah, I just updated the text from the 23.11 update, but I agree
validated is better than supported.

> And the extra line is not needed here.
> 

Right, I had copied below, but now I see in other branch that major
release has double space and minor release has single, so I'll keep to that.

I'll update this patch and main branch patch and send a v2, thanks.

> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to