On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 5:39 PM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> When a row is modified, python IDL doesn't perform any operations on
> existing client-side indexes.  This means that if the column on which
> index is created changes, the old value will remain in the index and
> the new one will not be added to the index.  Beside lookup failures
> this is also causing inability to remove modified rows, because the
> new column value doesn't exist in the index causing an exception on
> attempt to remove it:
>
>  Traceback (most recent call last):
>    File "ovsdbapp/backend/ovs_idl/connection.py", line 110, in run
>      self.idl.run()
>    File "ovs/db/idl.py", line 465, in run
>      self.__parse_update(msg.params[2], OVSDB_UPDATE3)
>    File "ovs/db/idl.py", line 924, in __parse_update
>      self.__do_parse_update(update, version, self.tables)
>    File "ovs/db/idl.py", line 964, in __do_parse_update
>      changes = self.__process_update2(table, uuid, row_update)
>    File "ovs/db/idl.py", line 991, in __process_update2
>      del table.rows[uuid]
>    File "ovs/db/custom_index.py", line 102, in __delitem__
>      index.remove(val)
>    File "ovs/db/custom_index.py", line 66, in remove
>      self.values.remove(self.index_entry_from_row(row))
>    File "sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py", line 2015, in remove
>      raise ValueError('{0!r} not in list'.format(value))
>  ValueError: Datapath_Binding(
>    uuid=UUID('498e66a2-70bc-4587-a66f-0433baf82f60'),
>    tunnel_key=16711683, load_balancers=[], external_ids={}) not in list
>
> Fix that by always removing an existing row from indexes before
> modification and adding back afterwards.  This ensures that old
> values are removed from the index and new ones are added.
>
> This behavior is consistent with the C implementation.
>
> The new test that reproduces the removal issue is added.  Some extra
> testing infrastructure added to be able to handle and print out the
> 'indexed' table from the idltest schema.
>
> Fixes: 13973bc41524 ("Add multi-column index support for the Python IDL")
> Reported-at: 
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2024-May/053159.html
> Reported-by: Roberto Bartzen Acosta <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>

I've tested this a bit and it seems like a reasonable solution.

Acked-by: Mike Pattrick <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to