On 6/7/24 15:26, [email protected] wrote: > > > On 07/06/2024 14:20, Dumitru Ceara wrote: >> On 6/7/24 12:24, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> On 06/06/2024 17:34, Dumitru Ceara wrote: >>>> On 6/5/24 16:52, Brendan Doyle via dev wrote: >>>>> So I'm wondering will this break the LSP option: >>>>>> *o**p**t**i**o**n**s* *:* *a**r**p**_**p**r**o**x**y*: >>>>>> optional string >>>>>> Optional. A list of MAC and >>>>>> addresses/cidrs or >>>>>> just ad‐ >>>>>> dresses/cidrs that this logical >>>>>> switch*r**o**u**t**e**r* port will reply to >>>>>> ARP/NDP requests. >>>>>> Examples:*1**6**9**.**2**5**4**.**2**3**9**.**2**5**4* >>>>>> *1**6**9**.**2**5**4**.**2**3**9**.**2*, >>>>>> *0**a**:**5**8**:**a**9**:**f**e**:**0**1**:**0**1* >>>>>> *1**6**9**.**2**5**4**.**2**3**9**.**2**5**4* >>>>>> *1**6**9**.**2**5**4**.**2**3**9**.**2* >>>>>> >>>>>> *1**6**9**.**2**5**4**.**2**3**8**.**0**/**2**4*,*f**d**7**b**:**6**b**4**d**:**7**b**2**5**:**d**2**2**f**:**:**1* >>>>>> *f**d**7**b**:**6**b**4**d**:**7**b**2**5**:**d**2**2**f**:**:**2*, >>>>>> *0**a**:**5**8**:**a**9**:**f**e**:**0**1**:**0**1* >>>>>> *f**d**7**b**:**6**b**4**d**:**7**b**2**5**:**d**2**2**f**:**:**0**/**6**4*. >>>>>> The*o**p**t**i**o**n**s**:**r**o**u**t**e**r**-* >>>>>> *p**o**r**t*’s logical router should have a >>>>>> route >>>>>> to forward packets >>>>>> sent to configured proxy ARP MAC/IPs to an >>>>>> appropriate >>>>>> destina‐ >>>>>> tion. >>>> Hi Brendan, >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand what breaks. Do you have a specific scenario >>>> in mind? The patch is for the arp-proxy feature. I doubt that people >>>> rely on ARP requests originated by logical routers being handled by the >>>> arp proxy on the connected logical switch port. But I might be wrong. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dumitru >>> The arp_proxy option allows an lsp prot connected to an LR to respond >>> to ARP requests sent from say a VM connected to the same LS. >>> >> Right, we have a test for that: >> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/blob/main/tests/system-ovn.at*L10721-L10869__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!K8qbDDzmm6Fz7yPm3lubG0kMbM_MmKQPqAW5ewepc1iqUAdif248P613_b0CNhmCXnEozbrwpIVCStm3Jg$ >> >> And the patch doesn't change it, it just expands it. Or am I missing >> something? > > No, I think we are good then just checking. >
Cool, thanks for that! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
