Xin Long <[email protected]> wrote: > > master connection only if it is not yet confirmed. Users may commit > > different > > labels for the related connection. This should be more in line with the > > previous behavior. > > > > What do you think? > > > You're right. > Also, I noticed the related ct->mark is set to master ct->mark in > init_conntrack() as well as secmark when creating the related ct. > > Hi, Florian, > > Any reason why the labels are not set to master ct's in there?
The intent was to have lables be set only via ctnetlink (userspace) or ruleset. The original use case was for tagging connections based on observed behaviour/properties at a later time, not at start of flow. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
