On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:29 AM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 7/24/24 20:07, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> > Currently it is possible to call netdev-dpdk/get-mempool-info before a
> > mempool as been created. This can happen because a device is added to
> > the netdev_shash before a mempool is allocated for it, which results in
> > a segmentation fault.
> >
> > Now we check for a NULL value before attempting to dereference it.
> >
> > Fixes: be4817331071 ("netdev-dpdk: Add debug appctl to get mempool 
> > information.")
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v2: Added a test for this issue.
> > ---
> >  lib/netdev-dpdk.c    | 12 ++++++++----
> >  tests/system-dpdk.at |  5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > index 02cef6e45..6afa6da88 100644
> > --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > @@ -4664,10 +4664,14 @@ netdev_dpdk_get_mempool_info(struct unixctl_conn 
> > *conn,
> >          ovs_mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> >          ovs_mutex_lock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >
> > -        rte_mempool_dump(stream, dev->dpdk_mp->mp);
> > -        fprintf(stream, "    count: avail (%u), in use (%u)\n",
> > -                rte_mempool_avail_count(dev->dpdk_mp->mp),
> > -                rte_mempool_in_use_count(dev->dpdk_mp->mp));
> > +        if (dev->dpdk_mp) {
> > +            rte_mempool_dump(stream, dev->dpdk_mp->mp);
> > +            fprintf(stream, "    count: avail (%u), in use (%u)\n",
> > +                    rte_mempool_avail_count(dev->dpdk_mp->mp),
> > +                    rte_mempool_in_use_count(dev->dpdk_mp->mp));
> > +        } else {
> > +            fprintf(stream, "    Not allocated\n");
>
> Hi, Mike.  Do we actually need these spaces at the beginning?
> The other fprintf has them because this is the way rte_mempool_dump()
> formats mempool statistics and we're trying to blend in, but it seems
> unnecessary for the no-mempool case.

I don't know what is best here. The spaces are similar to the current
formatting, but maybe nothing should be printed at all instead?

-M

>
> Best regards, Ilya Maixmets.
>
> > +        }
> >
> >          ovs_mutex_unlock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >          ovs_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
> > diff --git a/tests/system-dpdk.at b/tests/system-dpdk.at
> > index 1c97bf777..ecf4c7496 100644
> > --- a/tests/system-dpdk.at
> > +++ b/tests/system-dpdk.at
> > @@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ ADD_VHOST_USER_CLIENT_PORT([br10], 
> > [dpdkvhostuserclient0], [$OVS_RUNDIR/dpdkvhos
> >  AT_CHECK([ovs-vsctl show], [], [stdout])
> >  sleep 2
> >
> > +dnl Check that no mempool was allocated.
> > +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl netdev-dpdk/get-mempool-info dpdkvhostuserclient0], 
> > [0], [dnl
> > +    Not allocated
> > +])
> > +
> >  dnl Clean up
> >  AT_CHECK([ovs-vsctl del-port br10 dpdkvhostuserclient0], [], [stdout], 
> > [stderr])
> >  OVS_DPDK_STOP_VSWITCHD(["dnl
>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to