I don't mind merging them, but while we are at the topic. Are there benefits in processing performance in "fewer, more complex rules" vs "more, less complex rules"? Or is it just to improve readability?
Martin. On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 11:08 +0200, Dumitru Ceara wrote: > On Friday, August 9, 2024, Vladislav Odintsov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Don't we want to merge these two conditions into one logical > > > flow? > > > > > > E.g.: > > > > > > "(ip%d.dst == %s && (%s.dst == %d && %s.src == %d)" > > > > Sorry, there is typo. It should be: > > > > "(ip%d.dst == %s && (%s.dst == %d || %s.src == %d)" > > > > > ? > > > > > > This will make one logical flow per LRP IP per protocol instead > > > of two. > > > > I didn’t test this but I think that looks ok. > > Regards, > Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
