On 10/21/24 11:27, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 21/10/2024 09:27, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18 Oct 2024, at 18:17, David Marchand wrote:
>>
>>> Following introduction of a IPv6 address structure and its use in
>>> the rte_ipv6_hdr struct referenced by rte_flow IPv6 object,
>>> adjust code manipulating IPv6 rules in the offload code.
>>>
>>> Link: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=89b5642d0d45
>>> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]>
>>
>> Thanks for the patch David, this looks good to me. I know Kevin was going to 
>> rebase this branch soon.
>>
> 
> I rebased last week, so it's up to date with main branch now.
> 
>> Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>
>>
> 
> Thanks David, Robin and Eelco. LGTM, pushed to dpdk-latest branch.
> 
> Just to share for others, there is one CI fail which is a bit
> unintuitive at first glance. clang analyze is failing. The fail is for
> the OVS base branch. So it is OVS *without* this patch with DPDK main
> branch HEAD. That is expected as this patch is the one to fix the issue.

I guess, this patch is also a good opportunity to think how to make
clang-analyzer job not fail on DPDK upgrades as it seems that we'll
have a CI failure when we try to move the main branch to 24.11.

Any ideas on this?

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to