On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 11:15:08AM +0100, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> On 11/26/24 3:37 PM, Felix Huettner via dev wrote:
> > We previous relied on the fact the the southbound Port_Binding gets the
> > same name as the Northbound port. However in all of the cases we use
> > this we already know the name the southbound port will have. Therefor we
> 
> Nit: therefore
> 
> > just use this name, instead of getting it from northbound.
> > 
> > This is a prerequisite for later patches that use derived router ports.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Felix Huettner <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  northd/northd.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c
> > index 32a7c8509..fa3a8a882 100644
> > --- a/northd/northd.c
> > +++ b/northd/northd.c
> > @@ -3305,11 +3305,18 @@ ovn_port_update_sbrec(struct ovsdb_idl_txn 
> > *ovnsb_txn,
> >              if (router_port || chassis || is_cr_port(op)) {
> >                  struct smap new;
> >                  smap_init(&new);
> > -
> 
> Nit: unrelated.
> 
> >                  if (is_cr_port(op)) {
> >                      smap_add(&new, "distributed-port", op->nbsp->name);
> 
> Shouldn't this be op->primary_port->key too?

Yes, thanks.

> 
> >                  } else if (router_port) {
> > -                    smap_add(&new, "peer", router_port);
> > +                    /* op->peer can be null if the peer is disabed. In this
> > +                     * case we fall back to the router_port string which
> > +                     * might be wrong, but since the port does not exist 
> > that
> > +                     * does not matter. */
> > +                    if (op->peer) {
> > +                        smap_add(&new, "peer", op->peer->key);
> > +                    } else {
> > +                        smap_add(&new, "peer", router_port);
> > +                    }
> >                  }
> >                  if (chassis) {
> >                      smap_add(&new, "l3gateway-chassis", chassis);
> > @@ -4025,7 +4032,7 @@ sync_pb_for_lrp(struct ovn_port *op,
> >              lr_stateful_table_find_by_index(lr_stateful_table, 
> > op->od->index);
> >          ovs_assert(lr_stateful_rec);
> >  
> > -        smap_add(&new, "distributed-port", op->nbrp->name);
> > +        smap_add(&new, "distributed-port", op->primary_port->key);
> >  
> >          bool always_redirect =
> >              !lr_stateful_rec->lrnat_rec->has_distributed_nat &&
> > @@ -4050,10 +4057,7 @@ sync_pb_for_lrp(struct ovn_port *op,
> >              smap_add(&new, "peer", op->peer->key);
> >              if (op->nbrp->ha_chassis_group ||
> >                  op->nbrp->n_gateway_chassis) {
> > -                char *redirect_name =
> > -                    ovn_chassis_redirect_name(op->nbrp->name);
> > -                smap_add(&new, "chassis-redirect-port", redirect_name);
> > -                free(redirect_name);
> > +                smap_add(&new, "chassis-redirect-port", op->cr_port->key);
> >              }
> >          }
> >          if (chassis_name) {
> 
> Thanks,
> Dumitru
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to