On 1/29/25 12:16 PM, Felix Huettner via dev wrote:
> Previously vrf names where generated using "ovnvrf" + datapath id.
> Now the controller supports the dynamic-routing-vrf-name setting to
> overwrite this to whatever value the user desires.
> Note that the vrf ID is still the datapath id.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felix Huettner <felix.huettner@stackit.cloud>
> ---

Hi Felix,

>  controller/route-exchange.c | 14 ++++++--------
>  controller/route.c          | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  controller/route.h          |  2 ++
>  tests/system-ovn.at         | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/controller/route-exchange.c b/controller/route-exchange.c
> index 47ff2350e..79e65280b 100644
> --- a/controller/route-exchange.c
> +++ b/controller/route-exchange.c
> @@ -221,27 +221,25 @@ route_exchange_run(struct route_exchange_ctx_in 
> *r_ctx_in,
>      const struct advertise_datapath_entry *ad;
>      HMAP_FOR_EACH (ad, node, r_ctx_in->announce_routes) {
>          uint32_t table_id = ad->db->tunnel_key;
> -        char vrf_name[IFNAMSIZ + 1];
> -        snprintf(vrf_name, sizeof vrf_name, "ovnvrf%"PRIi32, table_id);
>  
>          if (ad->maintain_vrf) {
> -            if (!sset_contains(&old_maintained_vrfs, vrf_name)) {
> -                int error = re_nl_create_vrf(vrf_name, table_id);
> +            if (!sset_contains(&old_maintained_vrfs, ad->vrf_name)) {
> +                int error = re_nl_create_vrf(ad->vrf_name, table_id);
>                  if (error && error != EEXIST) {
>                      VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl,
>                                   "Unable to create VRF %s for datapath "
>                                   "%"PRIi32": %s.",
> -                                 vrf_name, table_id,
> +                                 ad->vrf_name, table_id,
>                                   ovs_strerror(error));
>                      continue;
>                  }
>              }
> -            sset_add(&_maintained_vrfs, vrf_name);
> +            sset_add(&_maintained_vrfs, ad->vrf_name);
>          } else {
>              /* a previous maintain-vrf flag was removed. We should therfor
>               * also not delete it even if we created it previously. */
> -            sset_find_and_delete(&_maintained_vrfs, vrf_name);
> -            sset_find_and_delete(&old_maintained_vrfs, vrf_name);
> +            sset_find_and_delete(&_maintained_vrfs, ad->vrf_name);
> +            sset_find_and_delete(&old_maintained_vrfs, ad->vrf_name);
>          }
>  
>          maintained_route_table_add(table_id);
> diff --git a/controller/route.c b/controller/route.c
> index 2d86edc97..d513b449e 100644
> --- a/controller/route.c
> +++ b/controller/route.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,21 @@ route_run(struct route_ctx_in *r_ctx_in,
>              char *ifname = nullable_xstrdup(
>                                      smap_get(&repb->options,
>                                               "dynamic-routing-ifname"));
> +
> +            const char *vrf_name = smap_get(&repb->options,
> +                                      "dynamic-routing-vrf-name");

Indentation is a bit off.

> +            if (vrf_name && strlen(vrf_name) >= sizeof ad->vrf_name) {
> +                VLOG_WARN("Ignoring vrf name %s, since it is too long",
> +                          vrf_name);

Maybe we should log the maximum here?  Also, please rate limit this log.

> +                vrf_name = NULL;
> +            }
> +            if (vrf_name) {
> +                memcpy(ad->vrf_name, vrf_name, strlen(vrf_name) + 1);
> +            } else {
> +                snprintf(ad->vrf_name, sizeof ad->vrf_name, "ovnvrf%"PRIi64,
> +                         ad->db->tunnel_key);
> +            }
> +
>              smap_add_nocopy(&ad->bound_ports,
>                              xstrdup(local_peer->logical_port), ifname);
>          }
> diff --git a/controller/route.h b/controller/route.h
> index 986c35ec0..1afaf0ef6 100644
> --- a/controller/route.h
> +++ b/controller/route.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  
>  #include <stdbool.h>
>  #include <netinet/in.h>
> +#include <net/if.h>
>  #include "openvswitch/hmap.h"
>  #include "sset.h"
>  #include "smap.h"
> @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ struct advertise_datapath_entry {
>      struct hmap_node node;
>      const struct sbrec_datapath_binding *db;
>      bool maintain_vrf;
> +    char vrf_name[IFNAMSIZ + 1];
>      struct hmap routes;
>  
>      /* The name of the port bindings locally bound for this datapath and
> diff --git a/tests/system-ovn.at b/tests/system-ovn.at
> index 963a67e0c..12985edd2 100644
> --- a/tests/system-ovn.at
> +++ b/tests/system-ovn.at
> @@ -14867,6 +14867,7 @@ OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD([
>  AT_SETUP([dynamic-routing - DGP])
>  
>  VRF_RESERVE([1337])
> +VRF_RESERVE([1338])
>  
>  # This test uses dynamic routing on a simulated multi-tenant internet
>  # connection.
> @@ -15113,10 +15114,22 @@ blackhole 192.0.2.10 proto 84 metric 100
>  blackhole 198.51.100.0/24 proto 84 metric 1000
>  233.252.0.0/24 via 192.168.10.10 dev lo onlink])
>  
> +# Changing the vrf name will switch to the new one.
> +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv set Logical_Router internet 
> options:dynamic-routing-vrf-name=ovnvrf1338

I had mentioned the misconfig of the dynamic-routing-vrf-name in my
reply to this patch last week, mentioning it again so the review is
consolidated. :)

> +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv set Logical_Router_Port internet-phys \
> +                             options:dynamic-routing-maintain-vrf=true
> +OVS_WAIT_UNTIL_EQUAL([ip route list vrf ovnvrf1338 | awk '{$1=$1};1'], [dnl
> +blackhole 192.0.2.1 proto 84 metric 1000
> +blackhole 192.0.2.2 proto 84 metric 100
> +blackhole 192.0.2.3 proto 84 metric 100
> +blackhole 192.0.2.10 proto 84 metric 100
> +blackhole 198.51.100.0/24 proto 84 metric 1000
> +233.252.0.0/24 via 192.168.10.10 dev lo onlink])
> +
>  # Stoping with --restart will not touch the routes.
>  check ovn-appctl -t ovn-controller exit --restart
>  OVS_WAIT_UNTIL([test "$(ovn-appctl -t ovn-controller debug/status)" != 
> "running"])
> -OVS_WAIT_UNTIL_EQUAL([ip route list vrf ovnvrf1337 | awk '{$1=$1};1'], [dnl
> +OVS_WAIT_UNTIL_EQUAL([ip route list vrf ovnvrf1338 | awk '{$1=$1};1'], [dnl
>  blackhole 192.0.2.1 proto 84 metric 1000
>  blackhole 192.0.2.2 proto 84 metric 100
>  blackhole 192.0.2.3 proto 84 metric 100

Regards,
Dumitru


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to