Hi Dumitru,



Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 às 11:19, Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> On 2/7/25 2:43 PM, Lucas Vargas Dias via dev wrote:
> > Fix the prefix filter function as the return condition when IPv6
> > prefixes have same length. If denylist prefix and prefix verified
> > have the same length, it must be have compared only.
> > Without this fix if denylist filter has
> > 2003:db08::/64 and it exists a route to 2003:db88, this route
> > is blocked because the calc for IPv6 doesn't check if they have
> > the same prefix lenght.
> > AND operator between prefix and denylist prefix will be
> > 2003:db08::/68 in this example (2003:db88::/64 & 2003:db08::64)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Vargas Dias <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> >  ic/ovn-ic.c     | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  tests/ovn-ic.at | 14 ++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ic/ovn-ic.c b/ic/ovn-ic.c
> > index 8320cbea5..7339811a4 100644
> > --- a/ic/ovn-ic.c
> > +++ b/ic/ovn-ic.c
> > @@ -1073,12 +1073,22 @@ prefix_is_deny_listed(const struct smap
> *nb_options,
> >              }
> >          } else {
> >              struct in6_addr mask = ipv6_create_mask(plen);
> > +            struct in6_addr m_bl_prefix = ipv6_addr_bitand(&bl_prefix,
> &mask);
> > +
> > +            if (plen == bl_plen) {
> > +                struct in6_addr prefix_v6 = ipv6_addr_bitand(prefix,
> &mask);
> > +                if (!ipv6_addr_equals(&prefix_v6, &m_bl_prefix)) {
> > +                        continue;
> > +                }
> > +                matched = true;
> > +                break;
> > +            }
>
> Why isn't this a problem for IPv4 too?
>
> Because for ipv4 it will be compared in if IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED and
it compares (prefix and mask) with (bl_prefix and mask). It considers the
mask
before the comparison.


> >              /* First calculate the difference between bl_prefix and
> prefix, so
> >               * use the bl mask to ensure prefixes are correctly
> validated.
> >               * e.g.: 2005:1734:5678::/50 is a subnet of 2005:1234::/21
> */
> >              struct in6_addr m_prefixes = ipv6_addr_bitand(prefix,
> &bl_prefix);
> >              struct in6_addr m_prefix = ipv6_addr_bitand(&m_prefixes,
> &mask);
> > -            struct in6_addr m_bl_prefix = ipv6_addr_bitand(&bl_prefix,
> &mask);
> > +
> >              if (!ipv6_addr_equals(&m_prefix, &m_bl_prefix)) {
> >                  continue;
> >              }
> > diff --git a/tests/ovn-ic.at b/tests/ovn-ic.at
> > index 9fc386131..0ce08260c 100644
> > --- a/tests/ovn-ic.at
> > +++ b/tests/ovn-ic.at
> > @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ for i in 1 2; do
> >      check ovn-nbctl set nb_global . options:ic-route-adv=true
> >      # Enable denylist single filter for IPv6
> >      check ovn-nbctl set nb_global . options:ic-route-denylist=" \
> > -            2003:db8:1::/64,2004:aaaa::/32,2005:1234::/21"
> > +            2003:db08:1::/64,2004:aaaa::/32,2005:1234::/21"
> >
> >      check ovn-ic-nbctl --wait=sb sync
> >      # Create LRP and connect to TS
> > @@ -1369,7 +1369,10 @@ for i in 1 2; do
> >
> >      # Create denylisted LRPs and connect to TS
> >      check ovn-nbctl lrp-add lr$i lrp-lr$i-p-ext$i \
> > -            11:11:11:11:11:1$i 2003:db8:1::$i/64
> > +            11:11:11:11:11:1$i 2003:db88:1::$i/64
> > +
> > +    check ovn-nbctl lrp-add lr$i lrp-lr$i-p-ext1$i \
> > +            11:11:11:11:12:1$i 2003:db08:1::$i/64
> >
> >      check ovn-nbctl lrp-add lr$i lrp-lr$i-p-ext2$i \
> >              22:22:22:22:22:2$i 2004:aaaa:bbb::$i/48
> > @@ -1388,6 +1391,7 @@ check ovn-ic-nbctl --wait=sb sync
> >  AT_CHECK([ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl lr-route-list lr1 |
> >      awk '/learned/{print $1, $2}' ], [0], [dnl
> >  2002:db8:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> > +2003:db88:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> >  2005:1834:5678::/50 2001:db8:1::2
> >  ])
> >
> > @@ -1403,7 +1407,8 @@ check ovn-ic-nbctl --wait=sb sync
> >  AT_CHECK([ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl lr-route-list lr1 |
> >      awk '/learned/{print $1, $2}' | sort ], [0], [dnl
> >  2002:db8:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> > -2003:db8:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> > +2003:db08:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> > +2003:db88:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> >  2004:aaaa:bbb::/48 2001:db8:1::2
> >  2005:1734:5678::/50 2001:db8:1::2
> >  2005:1834:5678::/50 2001:db8:1::2
> > @@ -1413,7 +1418,7 @@ for i in 1 2; do
> >      ovn_as az$i
> >
> >      check ovn-nbctl set nb_global . \
> > -            options:ic-route-denylist="2003:db8:1::/64,2004:db8:1::/64"
> > +            options:ic-route-denylist="2003:db88:1::/64,2004:db8:1::/64"
> >
> >      # Create an 'extra' denylisted LRP and connect to TS
> >      check ovn-nbctl lrp-add lr$i lrp-lr$i-p-ext5$i \
> > @@ -1424,6 +1429,7 @@ check ovn-ic-nbctl --wait=sb sync
> >  AT_CHECK([ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl lr-route-list lr1 |
> >      awk '/learned/{print $1, $2}' | sort ], [0], [dnl
> >  2002:db8:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> > +2003:db08:1::/64 2001:db8:1::2
> >  2004:aaaa:bbb::/48 2001:db8:1::2
> >  2005:1734:5678::/50 2001:db8:1::2
> >  2005:1834:5678::/50 2001:db8:1::2
>
> Regards,
> Dumitru
>
>
>  Regards,
Lucas

-- 




_‘Esta mensagem é direcionada apenas para os endereços constantes no 
cabeçalho inicial. Se você não está listado nos endereços constantes no 
cabeçalho, pedimos-lhe que desconsidere completamente o conteúdo dessa 
mensagem e cuja cópia, encaminhamento e/ou execução das ações citadas estão 
imediatamente anuladas e proibidas’._


* **‘Apesar do Magazine Luiza tomar 
todas as precauções razoáveis para assegurar que nenhum vírus esteja 
presente nesse e-mail, a empresa não poderá aceitar a responsabilidade por 
quaisquer perdas ou danos causados por esse e-mail ou por seus anexos’.*



_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to