On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:33 AM Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com> wrote:

> They were incorrectly added as part of the "Mirror" table section.
>
> Fixes: 74ada3273454 ("northd: Introduce the concept of transit routers.")
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  ovn-nb.xml | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovn-nb.xml b/ovn-nb.xml
> index 3ab514651d..ff5f2f2497 100644
> --- a/ovn-nb.xml
> +++ b/ovn-nb.xml
> @@ -3168,6 +3168,32 @@ or
>          See <em>External IDs</em> at the beginning of this document.
>        </column>
>      </group>
> +
> +    <group title="Transit router">
> +      <p>
> +        In order to achieve status of <code>Transit Router</code> for
> +        <ref table="Logical_Router"/> there needs to be at least one
> +        <ref table="Logical_Router_Port"/> that is considered remote.
> +        The LRP can be <code>remote</code> only if it has
> +        <code>options:requested-chassis</code> set to chassis that is
> +        considered remote. See <ref table="Logical_Router_Port"/> for more
> +        details.
> +      </p>
> +
> +      <p>
> +        In order for the <code>Transit Router</code> to work properly all
> the
> +        tunnel keys for the <code>Transit Router</code> itself and the
> remote
> +        ports keys needs to match  in all AZs e.g. TR in AZ1 and AZ2
> needs to
> +        have the same tunnel key. Remote port for AZ2 in AZ1 needs to
> have the
> +        same tunnel key as local port in AZ2 and vice vers.
> +      </p>
> +
> +      <p>
> +        The <code>Transit Router</code> behaves as distributed router
> which
> +        means that it has the same limitations for stateful flows like
> +        <code>NAT and LBs</code> and it will lose the CT state between
> AZs.
> +      </p>
> +    </group>
>    </table>
>
>    <table name="QoS" title="QoS rule">
> @@ -3310,32 +3336,6 @@ or
>      <column name="external_ids">
>        See <em>External IDs</em> at the beginning of this document.
>      </column>
> -
> -    <group title="Transit router">
> -      <p>
> -        In order to achieve status of <code>Transit Router</code> for
> -        <ref table="Logical_Router"/> there needs to be at least one
> -        <ref table="Logical_Router_Port"/> that is considered remote.
> -        The LRP can be <code>remote</code> only if it has
> -        <code>options:requested-chassis</code> set to chassis that is
> -        considered remote. See <ref table="Logical_Router_Port"/> for more
> -        details.
> -      </p>
> -
> -      <p>
> -        In order for the <code>Transit Router</code> to work properly all
> the
> -        tunnel keys for the <code>Transit Router</code> itself and the
> remote
> -        ports keys needs to match  in all AZs e.g. TR in AZ1 and AZ2
> needs to
> -        have the same tunnel key. Remote port for AZ2 in AZ1 needs to
> have the
> -        same tunnel key as local port in AZ2 and vice vers.
> -      </p>
> -
> -      <p>
> -        The <code>Transit Router</code> behaves as distributed router
> which
> -        means that it has the same limitations for stateful flows like
> -        <code>NAT and LBs</code> and it will lose the CT state between
> AZs.
> -      </p>
> -    </group>
>    </table>
>
>    <table name="Meter" title="Meter entry">
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
Thank you!
Acked-by: Ales Musil <amu...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to