On 3/18/25 5:08 PM, Aleksandra Rukomoinikova wrote: > Hi Dumitru, > Hi Alexandra,
> I want to clarify a little my question that I asked yesterday at the meeting, > it was formulated incorrectly by me > > in a situation when we have stateless acl and related one (or lb configured) > > before patch [0] (that is, before version v23.03.0 judging by the log) there > was a lookup in ingress > and in the egress of all packages in the conntrack > > because the packages fell under: > > table=4 (ls_in_pre_acl), priority=100, match=(ip), action=(reg0[0] = 1; next;) > table=0 (ls_out_pre_lb), priority=100, match=(ip), action=(reg0[2] = 1; next;) > > and then the packages were not committed because: > table=8 (ls_in_acl), priority=2002, match=(stateless acl match), > action=(next;) > > That is, we were cheating traffic to the contract, but did not commit, an > invalid state was returned. > > That is, such a situation arose when using stateless acls, which are higher > priority than statefull ones > or also when using lb. > > A similar situation is now occurring in my patch, I bypass it this way: > > Despite the enabled ct_match_inv option, we add it only if there is no > stateless acl + lb bundle > > What do you think? > > [0] - > https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/commit/a0f82efdd9dfd3ef2d9606c1890e353df1097a51. > Thanks for the additional details! I'm CC-ing Venu, Han and Numan for more input on this. Venu, you added this restriction that doesn't allow traffic matched by stateless ACLs to be load balanced, what is your opinion with respect to Alexandra's suggested change below? > > [0] Removed support for using load balancers in conjunction with stateless > ACL. > This commit removes the ability to use load balancers alongside stateless ACL. > If a load balancer is created, the datapath is no longer fully stateless. > Therefore, to avoid traffic being directed to the contract, it is recommended > to refrain from creating a load balancer entirely. > > Commit [0] ensures the separation of stateful and stateless scenarios > in the absence of load balancers, without altering the functionality > of load balancers themselves. > > When a logical switch is configured with stateless ACL and a load balancer, > the check for the `REGBIT_CONNTRACK_NAT` flag in the `pre_lb` stage of > the ingress pipeline becomes redundant. Traffic directed to the load balancer > must be processed through the conntrack. > > To ensure proper load balancer operation, a rule must be added to match > the load balancer's VIP address and its protocol (if applicable). This rule > is added to the datapath group and does not negatively impact performance. > Packets matching this rule would still be directed to the contract via > lower-priority rules in the absence of stateless ACL. However, with stateless > ACL, > this rule enables load balancing when the client balances traffic to itself. > > In the egress pipeline, the stateless register should only be set if no > load balancers are present on the datapath. This maintains a clear separation > between Stateful and Stateless modes when using ACL. > If a user creates a load balancer on a logical switch, they should be aware > that the traffic will no longer be fully stateless. > > Also in case of lb configured with stateless ACLs we no longer take into > account > ct.inv packets in egress. They will be dropped further, at the hypervisor > level. > > [0] - ovn-org@a0f82ef. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandra Rukomoinikova > <arukomoinikova@k2.cloud><mailto:arukomoinikova@k2.cloud> > --- > northd/northd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > northd/ovn-northd.8.xml | 13 ++++- > tests/ovn-northd.at | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > tests/ovn.at | 8 +-- > tests/system-ovn.at | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > 5 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) The "237: system-ovn-kmod.at:1031 Load Balancer LS hairpin IPv4 UDP - larger than MTU" test is failing with this patch applied, see CI run here: https://github.com/ovsrobot/ovn/actions/runs/13928303850/job/38978852134#step:9:4712 Something is weird because the test in question doesn't use stateless ACLs at all. So there must be a bug that's introduced by your patch. I did a cursory review of the rest of the patch and shared some more comments below. However, I'd like to hear from Venu/Han/Numan first, if possible, before moving towards a v3. > > diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c > index 1d3e132d4..fab420784 100644 > --- a/northd/northd.c > +++ b/northd/northd.c > @@ -5894,7 +5894,11 @@ build_stateless_filter(const struct ovn_datapath *od, > action, > &acl->header_, > lflow_ref); > - } else { > + } else if (!od->nbs->n_load_balancer){ > + /* For cases when we have statefull ACLs but no load > + balancer configured on logical switch - we should > + completely bypass conntrack on egress, otherwise > + it is necessary to check the balanced traffic. */ > ovn_lflow_add_with_hint(lflows, od, S_SWITCH_OUT_PRE_ACL, > acl->priority + OVN_ACL_PRI_OFFSET, > acl->match, > @@ -7355,6 +7359,49 @@ choose_max_acl_tier(const struct ls_stateful_record > *ls_stateful_rec, > } > } > > +/* In the case of stateless ACLs and load balancers, all traffic > + * is passed to conntrack during egress pipeline. Conntrack will > + * mark the packets as 'invalid,' but since stateless systems do > + * not rely on conntrack state, these invalid packets will be > + * discarded during processing on the hypervisor level. > + */ > +static bool > +stateless_inv_match(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > + const struct ovn_datapath *od, > + const struct ls_port_group_table *ls_port_groups) > +{ > + bool inv_match = true; There's no need for this variable, we always return after setting its value. > + > + if (ls_stateful_rec->has_lb_vip) { > + for (size_t i = 0; i < od->nbs->n_acls; i++) { > + const struct nbrec_acl *acl = od->nbs->acls[i]; > + if (!strcmp(acl->action, "allow-stateless")) { > + inv_match = false; > + return inv_match; Just return false here. However, a cleaner and slightly more efficient way of doing this would be to add a "has_stateless_acl" field to "struct ls_stateful_record" and populate it in ls_stateful_record_set_acl_flags(). > + } > + } > + > + const struct ls_port_group *ls_pg = > + ls_port_group_table_find(ls_port_groups, od->nbs); > + if (!ls_pg) { > + return inv_match; > + } > + > + const struct ls_port_group_record *ls_pg_rec; > + HMAP_FOR_EACH (ls_pg_rec, key_node, &ls_pg->nb_pgs) { > + for (size_t i = 0; i < ls_pg_rec->nb_pg->n_acls; i++) { > + const struct nbrec_acl *acl = ls_pg_rec->nb_pg->acls[i]; > + if (!strcmp(acl->action, "allow-stateless")) { > + inv_match = false; > + return inv_match; > + } > + } > + } > + } > + > + return inv_match; > +} > + > static void > build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record *ls_stateful_rec, > const struct ovn_datapath *od, > @@ -7457,8 +7504,15 @@ build_acls(const struct ls_stateful_record > *ls_stateful_rec, > * > * This is enforced at a higher priority than ACLs can be defined. */ > ds_clear(&match); > - ds_put_format(&match, "%s(ct.est && ct.rpl && ct_mark.blocked == 1)", > - use_ct_inv_match ? "ct.inv || " : ""); > + > + if (use_ct_inv_match && stateless_inv_match(ls_stateful_rec, > + od, ls_port_groups)) { > + ds_put_cstr(&match, "ct.inv || (ct.est && ct.rpl && " > + "ct_mark.blocked == 1)"); > + } else { > + ds_put_cstr(&match, "ct.est && ct.rpl && ct_mark.blocked == 1"); > + } If we go this way we should probably also update the "use_ct_inv_match" documentation in ovn-nb.xml. This is also a very noticeable behavior change, we should at least mention it in NEWS if we accept this patch. > + > ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, S_SWITCH_IN_ACL_EVAL, UINT16_MAX - 3, > ds_cstr(&match), REGBIT_ACL_VERDICT_DROP " = 1; next;", > lflow_ref); > @@ -7752,8 +7806,7 @@ build_lb_rules_pre_stateful(struct lflow_table *lflows, > } > ds_put_cstr(action, "ct_lb_mark;"); > > - ds_put_format(match, REGBIT_CONNTRACK_NAT" == 1 && %s.dst == %s", > - ip_match, lb_vip->vip_str); > + ds_put_format(match, "%s.dst == %s", ip_match, lb_vip->vip_str); > if (lb_vip->port_str) { > ds_put_format(match, " && %s.dst == %s", lb->proto, > lb_vip->port_str); > @@ -7763,6 +7816,22 @@ build_lb_rules_pre_stateful(struct lflow_table *lflows, > lflows, lb_dps->nb_ls_map, ods_size(ls_datapaths), > S_SWITCH_IN_PRE_STATEFUL, 120, ds_cstr(match), ds_cstr(action), > &lb->nlb->header_, lb_dps->lflow_ref); > + > + /* Pass all VIP traffic to the conntrack to support > + load balancers in the case of stateless acl. */ > + if (lb_vip->port_str && lb->proto) { lb->proto is always non-NULL, it can be omitted from the condition. What about load balancers that have a port specified? > + ds_clear(action); > + ds_clear(match); > + > + ds_put_cstr(action, "ct_lb_mark;"); > + ds_put_format(match, "%s && %s.dst == %s", > + lb->proto, ip_match, lb_vip->vip_str); Why not restrict this flow to only match traffic destined to the LB port, if the LB has a port configured? > + > + ovn_lflow_add_with_dp_group( > + lflows, lb_dps->nb_ls_map, ods_size(ls_datapaths), > + S_SWITCH_IN_PRE_STATEFUL, 115, ds_cstr(match), > ds_cstr(action), > + &lb->nlb->header_, lb_dps->lflow_ref); > + } > } > } > > diff --git a/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml b/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml > index 155ba8a49..2719ac77b 100644 > --- a/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml > +++ b/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml > @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ > <ref table="Logical_Switch_Port" db="OVN_Northbound"/>. Multicast, > IPv6 > Neighbor Discovery and MLD traffic also skips stateful ACLs. For > "allow-stateless" ACLs, a flow is added to bypass setting the hint for > - connection tracker processing when there are stateful ACLs or LB rules; > + connection tracker processing when there are stateful ACLs without LB; > <code>REGBIT_ACL_STATELESS</code> is set for traffic matching stateless > ACL flows. > </p> > @@ -624,6 +624,14 @@ > <code>ct_lb_mark;</code> action. > </li> > > + <li> > + A priority-115 flow sends all packet directed to VIP to connection > + tracker. Packets that match this rule would still be subject to > + connection tracking via lower-priority rules in the absence of > + stateless ACLs. However, with stateless ACLs in place, this rule > + enables load balancing when the client balances traffic to itself. > + </li> > + > <li> > A priority-100 flow sends the packets to connection tracker based > on a hint provided by the previous tables > @@ -770,7 +778,8 @@ > </li> > <li> > <code>allow-stateless</code> ACLs translate into logical flows that > set > - the allow bit and advance to the next table. > + the allow bit and advance to the next table. In case of load > balancers > + with stateless ACLs in this table we allow ct.inv packets go further. > </li> > <li> > <code>reject</code> ACLs translate into logical flows with that set > the > diff --git a/tests/ovn-northd.at b/tests/ovn-northd.at > index 419130aa8..c6540f90d 100644 > --- a/tests/ovn-northd.at > +++ b/tests/ovn-northd.at > @@ -3747,10 +3747,18 @@ for direction in from to; do > done > check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb sync > > -# TCP packets should not go to conntrack for load balancing. > +# TCP packets should go to conntrack for load balancing. > flow="inport == \"lsp1\" && ${flow_eth} && ${flow_ip} && ${flow_tcp}" > AT_CHECK_UNQUOTED([ovn_trace --ct new --ct new --minimal ls "${flow}"], [0], > [dnl > -output("lsp2"); > +ct_lb_mark { > + ct_lb_mark { > + reg0[[6]] = 0; > + reg0[[12]] = 0; > + ct_lb_mark /* default (use --ct to customize) */ { > + output("lsp2"); > + }; > + }; > +}; > ]) > > # UDP packets still go to conntrack. > @@ -3883,10 +3891,18 @@ for direction in from to; do > done > check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb sync > > -# TCP packets should not go to conntrack for load balancing. > +# TCP packets should go to conntrack for load balancing. > flow="inport == \"lsp1\" && ${flow_eth} && ${flow_ip} && ${flow_tcp}" > AT_CHECK_UNQUOTED([ovn_trace --ct new --ct new --minimal ls "${flow}"], [0], > [dnl > -output("lsp2"); > +ct_lb_mark { > + ct_lb_mark { > + reg0[[6]] = 0; > + reg0[[12]] = 0; > + ct_lb_mark /* default (use --ct to customize) */ { > + output("lsp2"); > + }; > + }; > +}; > ]) > > # UDP packets still go to conntrack. > @@ -4770,8 +4786,10 @@ check_stateful_flows() { > table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=100 , match=(reg0[[0]] == 1), > action=(ct_next;) > table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=110 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1), > action=(ct_lb_mark;) > table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=115 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip.is_frag), action=(reg0[[19]] = 1; ct_lb_mark;) > - table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip4.dst == 10.0.0.10 && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.10; > reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > - table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip4.dst == 10.0.0.20 && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.20; > reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=115 , match=(tcp && ip4.dst == > 10.0.0.10), action=(ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=115 , match=(tcp && ip4.dst == > 10.0.0.20), action=(ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip4.dst == 10.0.0.10 > && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.10; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip4.dst == 10.0.0.20 > && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.20; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > ]) > > AT_CHECK([grep "ls_in_lb " sw0flows | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl > @@ -5065,16 +5083,16 @@ AT_CAPTURE_FILE([sw0flows]) > > AT_CHECK([grep -w "ls_in_acl_eval" sw0flows | grep 6553 | ovn_strip_lflows], > [0], [dnl > table=??(ls_in_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(!ct.est && ct.rel && > !ct.new && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg0[[17]] = 1; reg8[[16]] = 1; > ct_commit_nat;) > - table=??(ls_in_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=((ct.est && ct.rpl && > ct_mark.blocked == 1)), action=(reg8[[17]] = 1; next;) > table=??(ls_in_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && !ct.rel && > !ct.new && ct.rpl && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg0[[9]] = 0; reg0[[10]] > = 0; reg0[[17]] = 1; reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_in_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && ct.rpl && > ct_mark.blocked == 1), action=(reg8[[17]] = 1; next;) > table=??(ls_in_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && > ct_mark.allow_established == 1), action=(reg0[[21]] = 1; reg8[[16]] = 1; > next;) > table=??(ls_in_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(nd || nd_ra || nd_rs > || mldv1 || mldv2), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > ]) > > AT_CHECK([grep -w "ls_out_acl_eval" sw0flows | grep 6553 | > ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl > table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(!ct.est && ct.rel && > !ct.new && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; ct_commit_nat;) > - table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=((ct.est && ct.rpl && > ct_mark.blocked == 1)), action=(reg8[[17]] = 1; next;) > table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && !ct.rel && > !ct.new && ct.rpl && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && ct.rpl && > ct_mark.blocked == 1), action=(reg8[[17]] = 1; next;) > table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && > ct_mark.allow_established == 1), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(nd || nd_ra || nd_rs > || mldv1 || mldv2), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > ]) > @@ -14333,7 +14351,7 @@ ovn-sbctl dump-flows s1 > s1flows > AT_CAPTURE_FILE([s1flows]) > > AT_CHECK([grep "ls_in_pre_stateful" s1flows | ovn_strip_lflows | grep > "30.0.0.1"], [0], [dnl > - table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip4.dst == 30.0.0.1), action=(reg4 = 30.0.0.1; ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip4.dst == > 30.0.0.1), action=(reg4 = 30.0.0.1; ct_lb_mark;) > ]) > AT_CHECK([grep "ls_in_lb" s1flows | ovn_strip_lflows | grep "30.0.0.1"], > [0], [dnl > table=??(ls_in_lb ), priority=110 , match=(ct.new && ip4.dst == > 30.0.0.1), action=(reg4 = 30.0.0.1; > ct_lb_mark(backends=172.16.0.103,172.16.0.102,172.16.0.101);) > @@ -14447,7 +14465,7 @@ ovn-sbctl dump-flows s1 > s1flows > AT_CAPTURE_FILE([s1flows]) > > AT_CHECK([grep "ls_in_pre_stateful" s1flows | ovn_strip_lflows | grep > "2001:db8:cccc::1"], [0], [dnl > - table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip6.dst == 2001:db8:cccc::1), action=(xxreg1 = 2001:db8:cccc::1; ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip6.dst == > 2001:db8:cccc::1), action=(xxreg1 = 2001:db8:cccc::1; ct_lb_mark;) > ]) > AT_CHECK([grep "ls_in_lb" s1flows | ovn_strip_lflows | grep > "2001:db8:cccc::1"], [0], [dnl > table=??(ls_in_lb ), priority=110 , match=(ct.new && ip6.dst == > 2001:db8:cccc::1), action=(xxreg1 = 2001:db8:cccc::1; > ct_lb_mark(backends=2001:db8:aaaa:3::103,2001:db8:aaaa:3::102,2001:db8:aaaa:3::101);) > @@ -14558,7 +14576,7 @@ ovn-sbctl dump-flows s1 > s1flows > AT_CAPTURE_FILE([s1flows]) > > AT_CHECK([grep "ls_in_pre_stateful" s1flows | ovn_strip_lflows | grep > "30.0.0.1"], [0], [dnl > - table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip4.dst == 30.0.0.1), action=(reg4 = 30.0.0.1; ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip4.dst == > 30.0.0.1), action=(reg4 = 30.0.0.1; ct_lb_mark;) > ]) > AT_CHECK([grep "ls_in_lb" s1flows | ovn_strip_lflows | grep "30.0.0.1"], > [0], [dnl > table=??(ls_in_lb ), priority=110 , match=(ct.new && ip4.dst == > 30.0.0.1), action=(reg4 = 30.0.0.1; > ct_lb_mark(backends=172.16.0.103,172.16.0.102,172.16.0.101);) > @@ -16753,3 +16771,69 @@ check grep -q "Bad configuration: The peer of the > switch port 'ls-lrp1' (LRP pee > > AT_CLEANUP > ]) > + > +OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD_NO_HV([ > +AT_SETUP([Load Balancers with stateless ACLs]) > +ovn_start ovn-northd > + > +AS_BOX([create logical switches and ports]) > +check ovn-nbctl ls-add sw0 > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb lsp-add sw0 sw0-p1 -- lsp-set-addresses sw0-p1 \ > +"00:00:00:00:00:02 10.0.0.2" > + > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb lsp-add sw0 sw0-p2 -- lsp-set-addresses sw0-p2 \ > +"00:00:00:00:00:03 10.0.0.3" > + > +AS_BOX([create stateless ACLs]) > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add sw0 from-lport 1001 "ip" allow-stateless > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add sw0 to-lport 1001 "ip" allow-stateless > + > +AS_BOX([create statefull ACLs]) > +# check if allow-stateless acls have higher priority we skip conntrack. > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add sw0 from-lport 1000 "ip" allow-related > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add sw0 to-lport 1000 "ip" allow-related > + > +ovn-sbctl dump-flows sw0 > sw0flows > + > +AT_CHECK( > + [grep -E 'ls_(in|out)_pre_acl' sw0flows | grep reg0 | ovn_strip_lflows], > [0], [dnl > + table=??(ls_in_pre_acl ), priority=100 , match=(ip), > action=(reg0[[0]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_acl ), priority=2001 , match=(ip), > action=(reg0[[16]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_pre_acl ), priority=100 , match=(ip), > action=(reg0[[0]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_pre_acl ), priority=2001 , match=(ip), > action=(reg0[[16]] = 1; next;) > +]) > + > +AT_CHECK( > + [grep -E 'ls_out_acl_eval' sw0flows | grep 65532 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], > [dnl > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(!ct.est && ct.rel && > !ct.new && !ct.inv && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; > ct_commit_nat;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && !ct.rel && > !ct.new && !ct.inv && ct.rpl && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg8[[16]] = > 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && > ct_mark.allow_established == 1), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.inv || (ct.est && > ct.rpl && ct_mark.blocked == 1)), action=(reg8[[17]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(nd || nd_ra || nd_rs > || mldv1 || mldv2), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > +]) > + > +AS_BOX([create Load Balancer]) > +check ovn-nbctl lb-add lb1 10.0.0.4:80 10.0.0.2:80,10.0.0.3:80 > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb ls-lb-add sw0 lb1 > + > +ovn-sbctl dump-flows sw0 > sw0flows > + > +AT_CHECK( > + [grep -E 'ls_(in|out)_pre_acl' sw0flows | grep reg0 | ovn_strip_lflows], > [0], [dnl > + table=??(ls_in_pre_acl ), priority=100 , match=(ip), > action=(reg0[[0]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_acl ), priority=2001 , match=(ip), > action=(reg0[[16]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_pre_acl ), priority=100 , match=(ip), > action=(reg0[[0]] = 1; next;) > +]) > + > +# we do not match conntrack invalide packets in case of load balancers with > stateless ACLs > +AT_CHECK( > + [grep -E 'ls_out_acl_eval' sw0flows | grep 65532 | ovn_strip_lflows], [0], > [dnl > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(!ct.est && ct.rel && > !ct.new && !ct.inv && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; > ct_commit_nat;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && !ct.rel && > !ct.new && !ct.inv && ct.rpl && ct_mark.blocked == 0), action=(reg8[[16]] = > 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && ct.rpl && > ct_mark.blocked == 1), action=(reg8[[17]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(ct.est && > ct_mark.allow_established == 1), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > + table=??(ls_out_acl_eval ), priority=65532, match=(nd || nd_ra || nd_rs > || mldv1 || mldv2), action=(reg8[[16]] = 1; next;) > +]) > +AT_CLEANUP > +]) > + > diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at > index afde2576f..3e299711b 100644 > --- a/tests/ovn.at > +++ b/tests/ovn.at > @@ -26345,7 +26345,7 @@ OVS_WAIT_FOR_OUTPUT( > [ovn-sbctl dump-flows > sbflows > ovn-sbctl dump-flows sw0 | grep ct_lb_mark | grep priority=120 | sed > 's/table=..//'], 0, > [dnl > - (ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && ip4.dst == > 10.0.0.10 && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.10; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; > ct_lb_mark;) > + (ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip4.dst == 10.0.0.10 && > tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.10; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > (ls_in_lb ), priority=120 , match=(ct.new && ip4.dst == > 10.0.0.10 && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.10; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; > ct_lb_mark(backends=10.0.0.3:80,20.0.0.3:80; > hash_fields="ip_dst,ip_src,tcp_dst,tcp_src");) > ]) > > @@ -26390,7 +26390,7 @@ AT_CHECK( > [grep "ip4.dst == 10.0.0.10 && tcp.dst == 80" sbflows3 | grep priority=120 > |\ > ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl > table=??(ls_in_lb ), priority=120 , match=(ct.new && ip4.dst == > 10.0.0.10 && tcp.dst == 80), action=(drop;) > - table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip4.dst == 10.0.0.10 && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.10; > reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip4.dst == 10.0.0.10 > && tcp.dst == 80), action=(reg4 = 10.0.0.10; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > ]) > > AT_CAPTURE_FILE([sbflows4]) > @@ -26551,7 +26551,7 @@ OVS_WAIT_FOR_OUTPUT( > [ovn-sbctl dump-flows > sbflows > ovn-sbctl dump-flows sw0 | grep ct_lb_mark | grep priority=120 | sed > 's/table=..//'], 0, > [dnl > - (ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && ip6.dst == > 2002::a && tcp.dst == 80), action=(xxreg1 = 2002::a; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; > ct_lb_mark;) > + (ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip6.dst == 2002::a && > tcp.dst == 80), action=(xxreg1 = 2002::a; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > (ls_in_lb ), priority=120 , match=(ct.new && ip6.dst == 2002::a > && tcp.dst == 80), action=(xxreg1 = 2002::a; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; > ct_lb_mark(backends=[[2001::3]]:80,[[2002::3]]:80; > hash_fields="ipv6_dst,ipv6_src,tcp_dst,tcp_src");) > ]) > > @@ -26595,7 +26595,7 @@ AT_CHECK( > [grep "ip6.dst == 2002::a && tcp.dst == 80" sbflows3 | grep priority=120 |\ > ovn_strip_lflows], [0], [dnl > table=??(ls_in_lb ), priority=120 , match=(ct.new && ip6.dst == > 2002::a && tcp.dst == 80), action=(drop;) > - table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(reg0[[2]] == 1 && > ip6.dst == 2002::a && tcp.dst == 80), action=(xxreg1 = 2002::a; reg2[[0..15]] > = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > + table=??(ls_in_pre_stateful ), priority=120 , match=(ip6.dst == 2002::a > && tcp.dst == 80), action=(xxreg1 = 2002::a; reg2[[0..15]] = 80; ct_lb_mark;) > ]) > > AT_CAPTURE_FILE([sbflows4]) > diff --git a/tests/system-ovn.at b/tests/system-ovn.at > index dd13575e4..658e3eb26 100644 > --- a/tests/system-ovn.at > +++ b/tests/system-ovn.at > @@ -10087,6 +10087,28 @@ sed -e 's/zone=[[0-9]]*/zone=<cleared>/'], [0], [dnl > > AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/flush-conntrack]) > > +# del acls > +check ovn-nbctl acl-del foo > + > +# add statefull acl Comments should be sentences: start with a capital letter and end with a period. This applies to most comments added by this patch. Also, I might be wrong but I think the correct version is "stateful" instead of "statefull". This remark also applies to multiple places in this patch. > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add foo from-lport 1 1 allow-related > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv acl-add foo to-lport 1 1 allow-related > + > +# add stateless acl > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add foo from-lport 2 1 allow-stateless > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv acl-add foo to-lport 2 1 allow-stateless > + > +AT_CHECK([ip netns exec foo1 wget 192.168.2.2 -t 1 -T 1], [0], [ignore], > [ignore]) > + > +# check conntrack zone has no entry > +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack zone=$zone_id | \ > +FORMAT_CT(192.168.2.2) | \ > +sed -e 's/zone=[[0-9]]*/zone=<cleared>/'], [0], [dnl > +]) > + > +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/flush-conntrack]) > + > +# when lb configued: pass conntrack for vip traffic. Typo: configued > # add lb back > check ovn-nbctl ls-lb-add foo lb1 > > @@ -10096,13 +10118,14 @@ check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync > OVS_WAIT_UNTIL([ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow13 dump-groups br-int | \ > grep 'nat(dst=192.168.2.2:80)']) > > -# should not dnat so will not be able to connect > -AT_CHECK([ip netns exec foo1 curl 30.30.30.30 --retry 3 --max-time 1], [28], > [ignore], [ignore]) > +# now check with VIP > +AT_CHECK([ip netns exec foo1 wget 30.30.30.30 -t 3 -T 1], [0], [ignore], > [ignore]) > > -# check conntrack zone has no tcp entry > +# check conntrack zone has tcp entry > AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack zone=$zone_id | \ > FORMAT_CT(30.30.30.30) | \ > sed -e 's/zone=[[0-9]]*/zone=<cleared>/'], [0], [dnl > +tcp,orig=(src=192.168.1.2,dst=30.30.30.30,sport=<cleared>,dport=<cleared>),reply=(src=192.168.2.2,dst=192.168.1.2,sport=<cleared>,dport=<cleared>),zone=<cleared>,mark=2,protoinfo=(state=<cleared>) > ]) > > AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/flush-conntrack]) > @@ -10217,6 +10240,29 @@ AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/flush-conntrack]) > # remove lb > check ovn-nbctl ls-lb-del foo lb1 > > +# del acls > +check ovn-nbctl acl-del foo > + > +# add statefull acl > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add foo from-lport 1 1 allow-related > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv acl-add foo to-lport 1 1 allow-related > + > +# add stateless acl > +check ovn-nbctl acl-add foo from-lport 2 1 allow-stateless > +check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv acl-add foo to-lport 2 1 allow-stateless > + > +AT_CHECK([ip netns exec foo1 wget http://[[fd12::2]] -t 1 -T 1], [0], > [ignore], [ignore]) > + > +# check conntrack zone has no tcp entry > +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack zone=$zone_id | \ > +FORMAT_CT(fd12::2) | grep -v fe80 | \ > +sed -e 's/zone=[[0-9]]*/zone=<cleared>/'], [0], [dnl > +]) > + > +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/flush-conntrack]) > + > +check ovn-nbctl acl-del foo > + > # add stateless acl > check ovn-nbctl acl-add foo from-lport 1 1 allow-stateless > check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv acl-add foo to-lport 1 1 allow-stateless > @@ -10240,13 +10286,14 @@ check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync > OVS_WAIT_UNTIL([ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow13 dump-groups br-int | \ > grep 'nat(dst=\[[fd12::2\]]:80)']) > > -# should not dnat so will not be able to connect > -AT_CHECK([ip netns exec foo1 curl http://[[fd30::2]] --retry 3 --max-time > 1], [28], [ignore], [ignore]) > -# > -# check conntrack zone has no tcp entry > +# now check with VIP > +AT_CHECK([ip netns exec foo1 wget http://[[fd30::2]] -t 3 -T 1], [0], > [ignore], [ignore]) > + > +# check conntrack zone has tcp entry > AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack zone=$zone_id | \ > FORMAT_CT(fd30::2) | grep -v fe80 | \ > sed -e 's/zone=[[0-9]]*/zone=<cleared>/'], [0], [dnl > +tcp,orig=(src=fd11::2,dst=fd30::2,sport=<cleared>,dport=<cleared>),reply=(src=fd12::2,dst=fd11::2,sport=<cleared>,dport=<cleared>),zone=<cleared>,mark=2,protoinfo=(state=<cleared>) > ]) > > AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl dpctl/flush-conntrack]) > > > > -- > regards, > Alexandra. Regards, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
