Guillaume Nault <gna...@redhat.com> writes:
> Because skb_tunnel_check_pmtu() doesn't handle PACKET_HOST packets,
> commit 30a92c9e3d6b ("openvswitch: Set the skbuff pkt_type for proper
> pmtud support.") forced skb->pkt_type to PACKET_OUTGOING for
> openvswitch packets that are sent using the OVS_ACTION_ATTR_OUTPUT
> action. This allowed such packets to invoke the
> iptunnel_pmtud_check_icmp() or iptunnel_pmtud_check_icmpv6() helpers
> and thus trigger PMTU update on the input device.
>
> However, this also broke other parts of PMTU discovery. Since these
> packets don't have the PACKET_HOST type anymore, they won't trigger the
> sending of ICMP Fragmentation Needed or Packet Too Big messages to
> remote hosts when oversized (see the skb_in->pkt_type condition in
> __icmp_send() for example).
>
> These two skb->pkt_type checks are therefore incompatible as one
> requires skb->pkt_type to be PACKET_HOST, while the other requires it
> to be anything but PACKET_HOST.
>
> It makes sense to not trigger ICMP messages for non-PACKET_HOST packets
> as these messages should be generated only for incoming l2-unicast
> packets. However there doesn't seem to be any reason for
> skb_tunnel_check_pmtu() to ignore PACKET_HOST packets.
>
> Allow both cases to work by allowing skb_tunnel_check_pmtu() to work on
> PACKET_HOST packets and not overriding skb->pkt_type in openvswitch
> anymore.
>
> Fixes: 30a92c9e3d6b ("openvswitch: Set the skbuff pkt_type for proper pmtud
> support.")
> Fixes: 4cb47a8644cc ("tunnels: PMTU discovery support for directly bridged IP
> packets")
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gna...@redhat.com>
> ---
Thanks, Guillaume.
Reviewed-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
I did manage to test this with two hosts over the weekend, and it
appears to work for at least one forwarding case that I encountered.
Tested-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
