The OpenFlow mailing list archives at mailman.stanford.edu appear to be permanently offline. So use URLs of archives at archive.org instead.
Flagged by make check-doc. Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@ovn.org> --- Documentation/topics/design.rst | 2 +- Documentation/topics/porting.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/topics/design.rst b/Documentation/topics/design.rst index 656d60673e98..d06472687b2f 100644 --- a/Documentation/topics/design.rst +++ b/Documentation/topics/design.rst @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ is, the first byte of the encapsulated frame immediately follows the same way for compatibility. For an earlier discussion, please see the thread archived at: -https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-August/002604.html +https://web.archive.org/web/https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-August/002604.html [*] The quoted definition is directly from OF1.1. Definitions used inside OVS omit the 8-byte ``ofp_header`` members, so the sizes in this discussion are diff --git a/Documentation/topics/porting.rst b/Documentation/topics/porting.rst index b627fde12607..2e56d571255f 100644 --- a/Documentation/topics/porting.rst +++ b/Documentation/topics/porting.rst @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ packet to software, slowing down not just UDPv6 but all IPv6 processing. .. [1] Aaron Rosen, "Modify packet fields extremely slow", openflow-discuss mailing list, June 26, 2011, archived at - https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-June/002386.html. +https://web.archive.org/web/https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-June/002386.html. Questions --------- -- 2.47.2 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
