> It's better to use the explicit vrf-id configuration instead of relying
> on the router's SB.Datapath_Binding.tunnel_key to be used as vrf-id.
> Change to the new configuration to not set a bad example.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>

> ---
>  tests/multinode.at | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/multinode.at b/tests/multinode.at
> index a646252c80..67d6f5df35 100644
> --- a/tests/multinode.at
> +++ b/tests/multinode.at
> @@ -3736,7 +3736,7 @@ check m_as ovn-gw-2 ip link set lo-wl-$vni up
>  check multinode_nbctl                                                        
>     \
>      -- lr-add lr                                                             
>     \
>        -- set logical_router lr options:dynamic-routing=true                  
>     \
> -                               options:requested-tnl-key=$vni                
>     \
> +                               options:dynamic-routing-vrf-id=$vni           
>     \
>        -- lrp-add lr lr-gw1 $host_bgp_mac_gw1 $host_bgp_ip_gw1/24             
>     \
>          -- lrp-set-gateway-chassis lr-gw1 ovn-gw-1 10                        
>     \
>          -- lrp-set-options lr-gw1 dynamic-routing-redistribute=nat,lb        
>     \
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to