> From: "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]>
> To: "Lance Richardson" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 July, 2017 7:46:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Subject: [openvswitch 2.7.1] testsuite: 7 8 767
> 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1900 1902
> failed
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:14:38PM -0400, Lance Richardson wrote:
> > > From: "Stuart Cardall" <[email protected]>
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Saturday, 8 July, 2017 5:22:17 PM
> > > Subject: [ovs-discuss] Subject: [openvswitch 2.7.1] testsuite: 7 8 767
> > > 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1900 1902 failed
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Attached is the test suite log for ovs 2.7.1 in Alpine Linux / musl c:
> > >
> > > testsuite: 7 8 767 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1900 1902 failed
> > >
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > >
> > > Stuart Cardall.
> > >
> >
> > These will pass if GNU awk is used instead of busybox awk (apk add gawk).
> >
> > 7: completion.at:343 vsctl-bashcomp - basic verification
> > 8: completion.at:425 vsctl-bashcomp - argument completion
>
> That's interesting. I thought I'd try to figure out the root of the
> problem, but I don't get failures in my usual environment if I replace
> "awk" by "busybox awk" and run these tests, so I wonder whether there's
> something else at play.
>
I just tried that (s/awk/busybox awk/ in utilities/ovs-vsctl-bashcomp.bash)
and got failures in those tests with similar symptom (no completions given).
This was on F26, x86_64, with busybox-1.22.1-6.
Strange... no idea. I did find a nice wiki explaining some differences between
busybox awk and some other implementations:
https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Awk
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
