On 24/07/2017 00:36, Sugu Deepthy wrote:
Hi Roi,
Thank you for  your reply.
Sorry for not getting back on this before. Was held up in some other stuff.
Please find my answers below.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Roi Dayan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 11/07/2017 14:28, Sugu Deepthy wrote:

        Hi Roi

        On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Sugu Deepthy
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

            Thank you Roi for your help!

            On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Roi Dayan
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:



                On 07/07/2017 17:36, Sugu Chandran wrote:

                    Hi,

                    I am trying to test hardware offloading feature in
        OVS using
                    a 2*25G
                    mellanox NIC.   My test setup has static OVS L2 rules to
                    forward packets
                    between these two ports. The traffic generators are
                    connected to these
                    ports to pump in traffic.
                    The hardware offloading is enabled in the system by
        using,
                        ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vSwitch .
                    other_config:hw-offload=true
                    I didnt set any hw-policy explicit,  as I kept it
        default as
                    'None'

                    I noticed that when I am sending traffic to these ports,
                    there are no
                    rules that are getting programmed into the hardware.
        Also
                    there are no
                    error reported in ovs-vswitchd.log as such.
                    Of Course the packets are getting forwarded in
        software.  Is
                    there
                    anything else needs to be done to make the TC for
                    programming the
                    mellanox NICs?

                    Regards
                    _Sugu



                Hi Sugo,

                Since you do not have errors in the log did you check if
        the rules
                were added to tc software?
                you can dump like this:
                # tc -s filter show dev ens5f0 ingress

            I dont see any rules that are configured with above tc dump.


    then nothing went to the HCA because even if the HW doesn't
    support it the rule should be in tc software.

[Sugesh] Yes thats right.




                You need to enable the offload feature on the HCA with
        ethtool.
                example:
                # ethtool -K ens5f0 hw-tc-offload on

            This is enabled .

            I am trying to forward traffic between two PFs on the same NIC?
            Does it supported in the offload implementation?


    offload between PF ports is currently not supported.
    only PF and its VFs.

[Sugu]
Ok. I am trying to do the traffic forwarding between PF and VFs . But no
luck so far.




            When creating the switchdev on PFs with 2 VFs, there is no VF
            netdevs are populated in my system. They are still showing
        as the
            vfs under the PF.
            Ofcourse there are no errors too.

            Also the system reports the mode 'inline-mode transport'is
        unsupported.
            I am using ubunutu 17.04 with 4.10 kernel.
            Is there anything I am missing here?
            Any help is really appreciated!.

        [Sugu] Some more details on this. I was really getting error
        when trying
        to enable hw-offload on mlnx-4 NICs.
        Didnt notice in the logs before.

        This the error info that I got from mellanox git.

        BAD_SYS_STATE | 0x368B01 | query_vport_counter: vport is not enabled
        (INIT_HCA is required)


    executing which command raised this error?

[Sugu] I upgraded the system and now I dont see this error anymore.
Instead I see this

[ 1103.216355] mlx5_3:wait_for_async_commands:722:(pid 3097): done with
all pending requests
[ 1115.954770] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: mlx5_cmd_check:697:(pid 3477):
QUERY_VPORT_COUNTER(0x770) op_mod(0x0) failed, status bad system
state(0x4), syndrome (0x368b01)
[ 1115.954902] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: mlx5_cmd_check:697:(pid 3477):
QUERY_VPORT_COUNTER(0x770) op_mod(0x0) failed, status bad system
state(0x4), syndrome (0x368b01)

I am getting this error back to back for every command(2 entry for each
command as I have 2 VFs, may be?)
starting from unbind, devlink, ethtool and starting the VM.
And inside the VM the VFs are not bound to any driver either. Is there
any wrong with the NIC?


looks like the syndrome you get is caused by querying a counter while
the HCA is not yes configured properly.
can you verify you are using the latest firmware?
can you verify the steps you do? did you enable sriov and moved to
switchdev mode?







        I verfied that the ports named eth1, eth2, eth3 and et4 are
        created for
        my vfs, when
        I ran the commands 'devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:07:00.0 mode
        switchdev' and
        'devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:07:00.1 mode switchdev'

        The detailed error in dmesg are given below,
        [ 1245.941287] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: mlx5_cmd_check:697:(pid
        3107):
        QUERY_VPORT_COUNTER(0x770) op_mod(0x0) failed, status bad system
        state(0x4), syndrome (0x368b01)
        [ 1245.941478] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.1: mlx5_cmd_check:697:(pid
        3107):
        QUERY_VPORT_COUNTER(0x770) op_mod(0x0) failed, status bad system
        state(0x4), syndrome (0x368b01)

        Please note I couldn't run the "inline-mode transport" command
        as its
        not supported.


    maybe you need newer iproute package. try to install latest upstream.

[Sugu]
I am using latest Ubuntu release


No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu Artful Aardvark (development branch)
Release:        17.10
Codename:       artful

and my kernel is
4.11.0-10-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 29 15:03:41 UTC 2017 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

And still it need to install the newer iproute package additonally? Is
that the requirement to use the hardware offload in OVS?
And my iproute version is
ip -V
ip utility, iproute2-ss161212
Can you share which version of iproute you use for the testing?

I'm using latest upstream. I'm not sure if all needed patches are in
Ubuntu distro.
my versions looks like this: ip utility, iproute2-ss170501

if you have devlink and you can change mode to switchdev without an
error then it's ok to start going.







                We still need to work on docs for this feature but for now I
                documented it a little here:
                https://github.com/roidayan/ovs/wiki
        
<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Froidayan%2Fovs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7C2bbfa311e8124ec5ded508d4d212e423%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636364425969048836&sdata=C1Hc08dwe3cjYKIgUyNeCbHI%2FnuZlITuPhPpdyZYyME%3D&reserved=0>

        
<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Froidayan%2Fovs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7C56f73b8b334b4413dd3608d4c84feee7%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636353693008610668&sdata=3orv%2FK9Diwoj5pMQAuBmRHF5QRuxNlwmZgOa3f1AaTE%3D&reserved=0
        
<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Froidayan%2Fovs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7C56f73b8b334b4413dd3608d4c84feee7%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636353693008610668&sdata=3orv%2FK9Diwoj5pMQAuBmRHF5QRuxNlwmZgOa3f1AaTE%3D&reserved=0>>

            As suggested in the wiki,



                Thanks,
                Roi




                    _______________________________________________
                    discuss mailing list
                    [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>

        
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fovs-discuss&data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7Cb226a368b9814cdc87ce08d4c5530730%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636350407766292115&sdata=9mMWoehygP7%2BmftGsOuyynyaHnYx%2FKQzka7gedr1%2FUE%3D&reserved=0
        
<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fovs-discuss&data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7Cb226a368b9814cdc87ce08d4c5530730%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636350407766292115&sdata=9mMWoehygP7%2BmftGsOuyynyaHnYx%2FKQzka7gedr1%2FUE%3D&reserved=0>

        
<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fovs-discuss&data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7Cb226a368b9814cdc87ce08d4c5530730%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636350407766292115&sdata=9mMWoehygP7%2BmftGsOuyynyaHnYx%2FKQzka7gedr1%2FUE%3D&reserved=0
        
<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fovs-discuss&data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7Cb226a368b9814cdc87ce08d4c5530730%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636350407766292115&sdata=9mMWoehygP7%2BmftGsOuyynyaHnYx%2FKQzka7gedr1%2FUE%3D&reserved=0>>




_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to