Oh, that kind of port.  The word "port" has too many meanings.

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:03:03AM +0000, Amar Padmanabhan wrote:
> Thanks Ben, I think we figured it out.
> We want the controller to allocate port numbers to prevent the round trip 
> when we create a port and wanted to understand what is a safe range to 
> allocate through the ofport_request so we don’t have to worry about 
> collisions with the vswitch allocated port numbers. We are running with > 32k.
> Thanks 
> - Amar
> 
> On 10/26/17, 10:45 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Ben 
> Pfaff" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:08:48AM +0000, Tommy Romano wrote:
>     > We’re trying to manually set the openflow port numbers for our OVS
>     > bridge ports. What port numbers should we avoid setting? I thought it
>     > was 1-16k and 65534-65535 that are allocated by OVS, but wanted to
>     > confirm.
>     
>     I don't really understand this question.  OpenFlow usually runs on port
>     6653, or sometimes on the legacy port number 6633.
>     _______________________________________________
>     discuss mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=1N_8hJDvy8eod04dYLy1EEUb1Kv1C1D7BI6HusLWBwA&m=cLyg15u5mnxKvFxLchUXmqY5A-eeQwDywtIkmHfeSUw&s=qW8Lrnzus3XZtPgT9I6XLo1M43d8szyVsDFtLmfx6dw&e=
>     
> 
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to