I posted the patches to add clustering support to OVSDB at the end of last year so that it was technically qualified to make it into OVS 2.9. At least in OVS 2.9, it will be marked "experimental", since it's a major change that might need work to be suitable for production (we simply don't know yet). Since it's a huge change, review is naturally taking a while.
It occurred to me that it might make more sense to get this into master just after we branch for 2.9. Then it would be basically the first feature in 2.10. That would give us the whole 2.10 release cycle to get it from experimental to something production quality, and we could in theory release 2.10 with a solid clustered OVSDB. Instead of experimental in 2.9 and then production in 2.10, we'd just have production in 2.10. That might also give us some opportunity to make breaking changes within the 2.10 cycle that users who were experimenting with 2.9 might be reluctant to accept as part of an upgrade. Does anyone have thoughts on which is the preferred path? Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss