Hi Ricardo,
After some more time to look at the issue you could do something like below to
enable crc for the interface (Note I haven’t fully validated this).
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
index af9843a..28d7d1e 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
+++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
@@ -700,6 +700,12 @@ dpdk_eth_dev_queue_setup(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int
n_rxq, int n_txq)
conf.rxmode.hw_ip_checksum = (dev->hw_ol_features &
NETDEV_RX_CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD) != 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Need to enable hw_strip_crc specifically for SRIOV devices.
+ */
+ conf.rxmode.hw_strip_crc = 1;
+
On my system this at least got past the configuration error when adding the
SRIOV VF port and I was able to pass traffic through the port in a simple VF to
phy port setup . As I’ve only completed minor validation on this maybe you
could give it a shot and see if it works on your setup.
With regards to the VSI queue error I mentioned in previous posts, with some
more investigation I found this only occurred when running the setup of SRIOV
VFs in DPDK with GDB, I was able to reproduce the same issue in the DPDK l2fwd
sample app so it is not specific to OVS. Once you are not running OVS with GDB
during the SRIOV setup it should be OK. I’ll need to look at this in a little
bit more detail when I have time but for the moment it shouldn’t block you.
Hope this helps,
Regards
Ian
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
[mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Stokes, Ian
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 11:52 AM
To: riccardoravai...@gmail.com
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] segmentation fault when adding a VF in DPDK to a
switch
Hi Ricardo,
Apologies for the delay. Unfortunately with the OVS 2.9 release I haven’t had
much time to look at this further.
At the very least I think work needs to be done for dpdk.c and netdev-dpdk.c to
enable configuration of VFs specifically (to account for the HW_CRC and VSI
queue configurations).
There would also be a task to ensure the work required for enabling a VF on the
i40e driver would also cover enabling a VF for the ixgbe driver. In DPDK it’s
been the case in the past that driver implementations for different NIC devices
can differ.
This could be looked at in the OVS 2.10 development cycle at some point. I can
post an update here when there is progress.
Thanks
Ian
From: scaricapo...@gmail.com<mailto:scaricapo...@gmail.com>
[mailto:scaricapo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Riccardo Ravaioli
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:35 PM
To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com<mailto:ian.sto...@intel.com>>
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] segmentation fault when adding a VF in DPDK to a
switch
Hi Ian,
Thanks for looking into the issue. Anything new?
Thanks a lot!
Riccardo
On 11 January 2018 at 23:50, Stokes, Ian
<ian.sto...@intel.com<mailto:ian.sto...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi Ricardo,
That’s for reporting the issue and providing the steps to reproduce.
I was able to reproduce this with an i40e VF using igb_uio.
In short it seems there is no support currently for ixgbe and i40e VF devices
in OVS with DPDK.
There are 2 issues at play here. First is the configuration error when
creating and starting the VF in DPDK, the second issue is the Segfault in OVS.
The configuration of the VF fails (For the i40e device at least) because of the
expectation in DPDK that the HW_CRC stripping flag is enabled in the device
configuration for VFs. In your logs you will see an error reporting this. By
default this seems to be disabled for VFs in OVS.
Looking in the DPDK code this is confirmed by the following in
i40evf_dev_configure() which code execution hits
│1568 /* For non-DPDK PF drivers, VF has no ability to disable HW
│1569 * CRC strip, and is implicitly enabled by the PF.
│1570 */
│1571 if (!conf->rxmode.hw_strip_crc) {
│1572 vf =
I40EVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(dev->data->dev_private);
│1573 if ((vf->version_major == VIRTCHNL_VERSION_MAJOR) &&
│1574 (vf->version_minor <= VIRTCHNL_VERSION_MINOR)) {
│1575 /* Peer is running non-DPDK PF driver. */
│1576 PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "VF can't disable HW CRC
Strip");
│1577 return -EINVAL;
│1578 }
Out of interest I enabled HW_CRC in the configuration for the device manually
in the ovs code for testing purposes. Although this allows the queue
configuration to succeed the VF will later fail to start due to an issue with
VSI queue mapping when DPDK attempts to start the device. I’ll have to take
another look to see what exactly is going wrong here, I suspect there is more
configuration needed for VFs than PFs.
The segmentation fault happens due to the error occurring during the
dpdk_eth_dev_queue_setup() function, this is a separate issue and unrelated to
VFs. I have seen failures in this area cause segmentation faults before in OVS
so it’s an area that needs to be looked at again to handle DPDK errors properly
IMO.
I hope this answers your question and I’ll follow up once I have a little more
info on how to enable the VF functionality.
Thanks
Ian
From:
ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org>
[mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org>]
On Behalf Of Riccardo Ravaioli
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 10:27 AM
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] segmentation fault when adding a VF in DPDK to a
switch
Here are the steps to reproduce the issue:
1. Create one Virtual Function (VF) on a physical interface that supports
SR-IOV (in my case it's an Intel i350 interface):
$ echo 1 > /sys/class/net/eth10/device/sriov_numvfs
2. Lookup its PCI address, for example with dpdk-devbind.py:
$ dpdk-devbind.py --status-dev net
0000:05:10.3 'I350 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function 1520' if=eth11
drv=igbvf unused=igb_uio,vfio-pci,uio_pci_generic
3. Bind the VF to a DPDK-compatible driver. I'll use vfio-pci, but igb_uio too
will reproduce the issue:
$ dpdk-devbind.py --bind=vfio-pci 0000:05:10.3
4. Create an OVS bridge and set its datapath type to netdev:
$ ovs-vsctl add-br br0 -- set bridge br0 datapath_type=netdev
5. Add the VF to the bridge as a DPDK interface:
$ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk
options:dpdk-devargs=0000:05:10.3
6. Now ovs-vswitchd.log reports that OVS repeatedly crashes (segmentation
fault) and restarts itself, in a loop:
2018-01-11T09:28:28.338Z|00139|dpdk|INFO|EAL: PCI device 0000:05:10.3 on NUMA
socket 0
2018-01-11T09:28:28.338Z|00140|dpdk|INFO|EAL: probe driver: 8086:1520
net_e1000_igb_vf
2018-01-11T09:28:28.338Z|00141|dpdk|INFO|EAL: using IOMMU type 1 (Type 1)
2018-01-11T09:28:28.560Z|00142|dpdk|INFO|PMD: eth_igbvf_dev_init(): VF MAC
address not assigned by Host PF
2018-01-11T09:28:28.560Z|00143|dpdk|INFO|PMD: eth_igbvf_dev_init(): Assign
randomly generated MAC address c6:13:67:7b:31:6b
2018-01-11T09:28:28.560Z|00144|netdev_dpdk|INFO|Device '0000:05:10.3' attached
to DPDK
2018-01-11T09:28:28.563Z|00145|dpif_netdev|INFO|PMD thread on numa_id: 0, core
id: 3 created.
2018-01-11T09:28:28.566Z|00146|dpif_netdev|INFO|PMD thread on numa_id: 0, core
id: 2 created.
2018-01-11T09:28:28.566Z|00147|dpif_netdev|INFO|There are 2 pmd threads on numa
node 0
2018-01-11T09:28:28.646Z|00148|dpdk|INFO|PMD: igbvf_dev_configure(): VF can't
disable HW CRC Strip
2018-01-11T09:28:28.646Z|00149|netdev_dpdk|ERR|Interface dpdk-p0 MTU (1500)
setup error: Operation not supported
2018-01-11T09:28:28.646Z|00150|netdev_dpdk|ERR|Interface dpdk-p0(rxq:1 txq:1)
configure error: Operation not supported
2018-01-11T09:28:29.062Z|00002|daemon_unix(monitor)|ERR|1 crashes: pid 2494
died, killed (Segmentation fault), core dumped, restarting
7. Removing the VF from the bridge stops this behaviour:
$ ovs-vsctl del-port br0 dpdk-p0
The same happens if I restart openvswitch between steps 4 and 5 and let it
initialize itself with the list of DPDK devices, instead of hotplugging them at
runtime, as described above.
Riccardo
On 11 January 2018 at 01:27, Riccardo Ravaioli
<riccardoravai...@gmail.com<mailto:riccardoravai...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I was going through the openvswitch+dpdk tutorial and wanted to add a virtual
function (VF) to a bridge as a dpdk interface.
I can bind the VF to the vfio-pci driver successfully with dpdk-devbind.py, but
as soon as I add the interface to an ovs bridge (in netdev mode), openvswitch
goes in segmentation fault and continuously tries to restart itself.
I'm running openvswitch 2.8.1 and dpdk 17.11 on Debian jessie with Linux kernel
4.6.
Is this a known problem? Is there a fix?
I have the same issue with VFs bound to igb_uio, whereas with real physical
interfaces it works just fine.
Here are the relevant lines from ovs-vswitchd.log:
2018-01-10T15:53:26.949Z|00157|dpdk|INFO|PMD: igbvf_dev_configure(): VF can't
disable HW CRC Strip
2018-01-10T15:53:26.949Z|00158|netdev_dpdk|ERR|Interface 0.extra2 MTU (1500)
setup error: Operation not supported
2018-01-10T15:53:26.949Z|00159|netdev_dpdk|ERR|Interface 0.extra2(rxq:1 txq:1)
configure error: Operation not supported
2018-01-10T15:53:27.333Z|00066|daemon_unix(monitor)|ERR|fork child died before
signaling startup (killed (Segmentation fault))
2018-01-10T15:53:27.333Z|00067|daemon_unix(monitor)|WARN|23 crashes: pid 21413
died, killed (Segmentation fault), core dumped, waiting until 10 seconds since
last restart
2018-01-10T15:53:33.333Z|00068|daemon_unix(monitor)|ERR|23 crashes: pid 21413
died, killed (Segmentation fault), core dumped, restarting
Thanks!
Riccardo
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
