OK, thanks. If this is a lot of trouble, let me know and I'll investigate directly instead of on the basis of a suspected regression.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:06:50PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: > All right, I'll repeat it with code in branch-2.8. > Will post the results once the test finishes. > Daniel > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:53:15PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: > > > Repeated the test with 1000 ports this time. See attached image. > > > For some reason, the sizes grow while deleting the ports (the > > > deletion task starts at around x=2500). The weird thing is why > > > they keep growing and the online compact doesn't work as when > > > I do it through ovs-appctl tool. > > > > > > I suspect this is a bug and eventually it will grow and grow unless > > > we manually compact the db. > > > > Would you mind trying out an older ovsdb-server, for example the one > > from OVS 2.8? Some of the logic in ovsdb-server around compaction > > changed in OVS 2.9, so it would be nice to know whether this was a > > regression or an existing bug. > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
