On 7 Mar 2018, at 18:10, Shivaram Mysore <shivaram.mys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is my assumption that network operators would feel comfortable with only 
> one monitoring system than more than 1 and that too for each switch.  Am I 
> mistaken in my assumption?

It is hard to conjecture.  Standard engineering response:  it depends.  Who are 
the network operators?  What are you trying to do?  What do you want to do with 
the monitored information (probably a different answer for the management ports 
vs the data ports?)  …...

> Thanks
> 
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Raymond Burkholder <r...@oneunified.net 
> <mailto:r...@oneunified.net>> wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2018, at 15:21, Shivaram Mysore <shivaram.mys...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:shivaram.mys...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> the controller?  Or should we use gNMI or SNMP for those only?  Using 
>> anything other than Openflow means that there are 2 monitoring systems for 
>> the same switch which is a no-no for deployment.
> 
> Out of curiosity, why a ‘no-no’?  You are dealing with two different types of 
> traffic, each in a different traffic domain.  Possibly two or more different 
> control / management tools are in play, due to the different traffic domains.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is 
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is 
> believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to