On 7 Mar 2018, at 18:10, Shivaram Mysore <shivaram.mys...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is my assumption that network operators would feel comfortable with only > one monitoring system than more than 1 and that too for each switch. Am I > mistaken in my assumption?
It is hard to conjecture. Standard engineering response: it depends. Who are the network operators? What are you trying to do? What do you want to do with the monitored information (probably a different answer for the management ports vs the data ports?) …... > Thanks > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Raymond Burkholder <r...@oneunified.net > <mailto:r...@oneunified.net>> wrote: > On 7 Mar 2018, at 15:21, Shivaram Mysore <shivaram.mys...@gmail.com > <mailto:shivaram.mys...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> the controller? Or should we use gNMI or SNMP for those only? Using >> anything other than Openflow means that there are 2 monitoring systems for >> the same switch which is a no-no for deployment. > > Out of curiosity, why a ‘no-no’? You are dealing with two different types of > traffic, each in a different traffic domain. Possibly two or more different > control / management tools are in play, due to the different traffic domains. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss