On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:20:40AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:54:30AM +0000, Josh Bailey via discuss wrote: > > Hoping I'm missing something obvious! > > > > I have a flow like this: > > > > $ grep CONTROLLER sab-dump-flows.log > > cookie=0x5adc15c0, duration=63.446s, table=3, n_packets=60, n_bytes=3436, > > priority=0 actions=CONTROLLER:96 > > > > I can cause packets to match it, but no packets are output ot the > > controller. > > > > faucet@faucet:/var/tmp/faucet-tests-1KL3eg/FaucetUntaggedTestZeroPriorityFlowsTest-test_untagged$ > > tshark -l -n -Q -d tcp.port==40649,openflow -O openflow_v4 -Y > > "openflow_v4.packet_in.total_len>0" -r fa*cap|wc -l > > 0 > > > > If I specify any priority other than 0, it works (packets are output to > > controller via packet in messages). > > > > Is there something special about priority=0 flows and the CONTROLLER action? > > Yes, in fact OpenFlow specifies special cases for priority=0 flows that > match no fields. It calls these "table-miss" flows, see e.g. section > 5.4 in OpenFlow 1.5.1. Open vSwitch has some explicit special-case code > for dealing with them. > > I can't think of a particular reason why this special case would make a > difference for you. Maybe there is a bug. Do you have a way for us to > reproduce it? > > Did you try "ofproto/trace"? Maybe it will show a reason why the packet > is not sent to the controller. > > (I'm at a conference this week, so my schedule is weird.)
I wonder whether you figured out anything here and whether you have any more of a bug report for us. Happy to help, if so. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
