> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:18:31PM -0400, Flavio Fernandes wrote: >> Dear OVS Gurus: >> >> I came across something simple and silly, which is making me think it is >> actually a bug. >> >> In a nutshell, I'm trying to use a literal with the action output nested in >> a learn(). >> If I use a fancier (and more common) notation: >> >> output:NXM_OF_IN_PORT[] >> >> that works fine. However, if I try to use a literal such as: >> >> output:2 >> >> I get: >> >> ovs-ofctl: 2: unknown field `2' > > The learn action simply can't do that. (I think that the ovs-ofctl > manpage does not suggest that it can.)
Yes, I should have read it more carefully. It was an incorrect assumption on my part that the nested output action was the same as action outside learn. I am a better educated now. ;) Thanks for that clarification, Ben. -- flaviof
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
