On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 01:42:56PM +0200, David van Moolenbroek wrote:
> Ben,
> 
> On 6/4/2018 10:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >Thanks for the report.  I think that all of these problems are easy to
> >fix.  I sent a patch:
> >         https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/925221/
> >
> >If it is convenient for you to test, I'd be pleased to hear whether this
> >fixes the problems you observed with the noncompliant implementation you
> >mentioned.
> 
> Thank you for the patch! I can confirm that, when applied to the customized
> OVS 2.5.0 source on the ethernet switch, the patch resolves all our issues.
> I should mention there that the customized code does its own frame padding,
> so what I ended up testing does not qualify as a proper test for OVS itself,
> but it certainly looks good.

Thanks.  I applied this to master.

> Just for completeness, I feel obliged to remark that while OVS now does
> generate RSTP BPDUs with the correct ethernet frame length field (39 bytes),
> the Configuration and TCN BPDUs are still sent out with extra bytes (namely,
> with a length of 39 bytes instead of 38 and 7 bytes respectively). That has
> not been a problem during our experiments, but it might still be worth
> fixing, e.g. with offsetof() or a #define for those BPDUs' lengths or so.
> Either way, we are very happy with this fix - thank you again!

I'll leave that fix for a later day.

Thanks,

Ben.
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to