> On Sep 4, 2018, at 10:58 PM, Justin Pettit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 2:25 AM, Thomas Goirand <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Does it consistently fail for you?
>>
>> It's very deterministically failing indeed.
>
> Thank you for the information. I understand the nature of the issue, but I'm
> still thinking about the best way to address it. In the test, we send three
> sets of 100 packets. One of the sets drops packets at a rate of 10 per
> second, one at a rate of 5 per second, and one not at all. On my computer,
> it takes roughly 0.67 seconds to send those 300 packets. It appears that
> your computer takes over 15 seconds, which means that the 10 per second meter
> isn't hitting at all, and all packets are getting through. The test was
> intended to allow some flexibility in run-time, but not that extreme.
>
> I hope to have a fix out for it tomorrow, though.
Hi, Thomas. I sent a patch out that skips the test if the system is not
running fast enough to trigger the meter:
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-September/351879.html
If you have a chance, can you please give it a spin?
Thanks,
--Justin
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
