>From the core dump (that you sent me off-list), it looks like you are
using MUSL libc, rather than glibc:
blp@sigill:~/nicira/ovs/_build(127)$ ldd ./ovs-vswitchd
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff877bd000)
libssl.so.1.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1
(0x00007f6bc4526000)
libcrypto.so.1.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.1
(0x00007f6bc423e000)
libcap-ng.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcap-ng.so.0
(0x00007f6bc4236000)
libc.musl-x86_64.so.1 => not found
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f6bc4231000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007f6bc4210000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f6bc404d000)
/lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(0x00007f6bc47fb000)
blp@sigill:~/nicira/ovs/_build(0)$
Is that correct?
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 03:08:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> That is worth a shot. Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:06:08PM +0000, Fernando Casas Schössow wrote:
> > Too bad. :(
> >
> > Should I start over but leave it running for let's say 5-7 days instead?
> > Maybe 48 hours was not enough.
> >
> > On mié, mar 6, 2019 at 12:03 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:56:30PM +0000, Fernando Casas Schössow wrote:
> > Please find attached valgrind log. It was running for around 48 hours.
> > Hopefully it was enough otherwise let me know and I can run it again for
> > more time.
> > Thanks for the log. There are several suspicious warnings to look at in
> > this log, and I will do that. But it does not point out any significant
> > memory leaks--even if I consider all of the "possible leaks" it mentions as
> > actual leaks (usually, they are not), they are much too small by orders of
> > magnitudes to be the problem reported.
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
