Thank you Han, I will check out this fix.

From: Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 10:11 PM
To: Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <jing.c.zh...@nokia.com>
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.9.0 native firewall drops empty payload TCP 
packets continued



On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 6:04 PM Zhang, Jing C. (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) 
<jing.c.zh...@nokia.com<mailto:jing.c.zh...@nokia.com>> wrote:
>
> We (our VNFs) continue to observe the same empty payload TCP (ACK) packet 
> drop with native firewall (see original post below) after upgrading to Centos 
> 7.6. This packet drop results in unacceptable TCP performance, by that native 
> firewall still can not be enabled in product.
>
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2018-August/047263.html
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux overcloud-sriovperformancecompute-0 3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP 
> Mon Mar 18 15:06:45 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> $ ovs-vswitchd --version
> ovs-vswitchd (Open vSwitch) 2.9.0
> DPDK 17.11.0
>
> The scenario: OVS provider VLAN network is used
>
>
> in physical interface of ovs compute zero length tcp payload packet arrives 
> as padded to 64 bytes (and vlan tag is included in ethernet header)
> same packet does not appear anymore in the tcpdump taken from tap-xyz 
> interface (once vlan tag is removed and packet is cut by 4 bytes to 60 bytes)
>
>
> Tcpdump on physical port:
>
> 00:25:24.468423 fa:16:3e:d7:bb:2c > fa:16:3e:ff:dd:29, ethertype 802.1Q 
> (0x8100), length 2674: vlan 3837, p 0, ethertype IPv4, (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 
> 6893, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 2656)
>     192.168.10.52.80 > 192.168.10.60.57576: Flags [P.], cksum 0xa013 
> (incorrect -> 0x772d), seq 8961:11577, ack 78, win 210, length 2616: HTTP
> 00:25:24.468593 fa:16:3e:ff:dd:29 > fa:16:3e:d7:bb:2c, ethertype 802.1Q 
> (0x8100), length 60: vlan 3837, p 0, ethertype IPv4, (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 
> 56318, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
>     192.168.10.60.57576 > 192.168.10.52.80: Flags [.], cksum 0x1d34 
> (correct), seq 78, ack 11577, win 391, length 0
> 00:25:24.475848 fa:16:3e:ff:dd:29 > fa:16:3e:d7:bb:2c, ethertype 802.1Q 
> (0x8100), length 60: vlan 3837, p 0, ethertype IPv4, (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 
> 56319, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
>     192.168.10.60.57576 > 192.168.10.52.80: Flags [F.], cksum 0x1d33 
> (correct), seq 78, ack 11577, win 391, length 0
> 00:25:24.480337 fa:16:3e:d7:bb:2c > fa:16:3e:ff:dd:29, ethertype 802.1Q 
> (0x8100), length 2674: vlan 3837, p 0, ethertype IPv4, (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 
> 6894, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 2656)
>     192.168.10.52.80 > 192.168.10.60.57576: Flags [P.], cksum 0xa013 
> (incorrect -> 0x772d), seq 8961:11577, ack 78, win 210, length 2616: HTTP
>
> Tcpdump on vm tap interface:
>
> 00:25:24.468419 fa:16:3e:d7:bb:2c > fa:16:3e:ff:dd:29, ethertype IPv4 
> (0x0800), length 2670: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 6893, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
> TCP (6), length 2656)
>     192.168.10.52.80 > 192.168.10.60.57576: Flags [P.], cksum 0xa013 
> (incorrect -> 0x772d), seq 8961:11577, ack 78, win 210, length 2616: HTTP
> 00:25:24.480331 fa:16:3e:d7:bb:2c > fa:16:3e:ff:dd:29, ethertype IPv4 
> (0x0800), length 2670: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 6894, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
> TCP (6), length 2656)
>     192.168.10.52.80 > 192.168.10.60.57576: Flags [P.], cksum 0xa013 
> (incorrect -> 0x772d), seq 8961:11577, ack 78, win 210, length 2616: HTTP
>
> Very straightforward to see the issue:
>
>
> Configure neutron OVS agent to use native firewall
> Create a pair of VMs on separate computes on provider vLAN
> Disable TCP timestamp inside the VMs
> Exchange TCP traffic between the VMs, e.g. http download.
> Tcpdump on the physical and vm port, and compare.
>
>
> I wonder why such obvious issue is not widely discussed?
>
> Jing
>

Maybe it's fixed by:
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/9171c63532ee9cbc63bb8cfae364ab071f44389b

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to