Thanks Shivaram. I will wait for mainteners to comment as it would be nice to host a docker image of at-least one stable release to start with which could be either 2.11/2.12 or upcoming 2.13 version under ovs/ovn org. What do you think?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:56 PM Shivaram Mysore <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > If it is useful, we can start this with: > GitHub.com/ServiceFractal/ovs > > /Shivaram > ::Sent from my mobile device:: > > On Nov 7, 2019, at 4:15 PM, aginwala <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All: > > As discussed in the meeting today, we all agreed that it will be a good > idea to push docker images for each new ovs/ovn stable release. Hence, need > help from maintainers Ben/Mark/Justin/Han to address some open action items > as it is more of org/ownership/rights related: > > 1. Get new repo created under docker.io with name either ovs/ovn and > declare it public repo > 2. How about copy-rights for running images for open source projects > 3. Storage: unlimited or some limited GBs > 4. Naming conventions for docker images ;e.g > openswitch/ovn:2.13.1_debian or openswitch/ovn:2.13.1_rhel. Similar > for ovs. > > > Once this is done, we can bundle docker image changes in the same release > process > > Please feel free to add any missing piece. > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
