On 11/19/2019 7:27 PM, Eli Britstein wrote:
> Hi
>
> I see this file has many inconsistencies against the one from DPDK
> (18.11.2).
>
> For example, this API:
>
> rte_flow_query(uint16_t port_id,
> struct rte_flow *flow,
> enum rte_flow_action_type action,
> void *data,
> struct rte_flow_error *error);
>
> is wrong, vs the one from DPDK:
>
> rte_flow_query(uint16_t port_id,
> struct rte_flow *flow,
> const struct rte_flow_action *action,
> void *data,
> struct rte_flow_error *error);
>
> Note the "action" argument.
>
>
> I also see in it this line:
>
> #error "Use this header only with sparse. It is not a correct
> implementation."
>
>
> So, is it wrong on purpose? If so, why?
>
> I test my patch-set before I submit using travis, and it fails because
> of this wrong file. Can we just take the correct code from DPDK?
> Should I maybe take only the parts that cause me to fail?
>
>
> Please advise,
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eli
>
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
