Hi Luis,

I haven't yet had time to give it a try in our lab, but from reading your blog 
posts I have a quick question. How does it work when either DPDK or NIC offload 
is used for OVN traffic? It seems you are (de-)encapsulating traffic on chassis 
nodes by routing them through kernel - is this current design or just an 
artifact of PoC code?

--
  Krzysztof Klimonda
  kklimo...@syntaxhighlighted.com



On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, at 11:29, Luis Tomas Bolivar wrote:
> Hi Sergey, all,
> 
> In fact we are working on a solution based on FRR where a (python) agent 
> reads from OVN SB DB (port binding events) and triggers FRR so that the 
> needed routes gets advertised. It leverages kernel networking to redirect the 
> traffic to the OVN overlay, and therefore does not require any modifications 
> to ovn itself (at least for now). The PoC code can be found here: 
> https://github.com/luis5tb/bgp-agent
> 
> And there is a series of blog posts related to how to use it on OpenStack and 
> how it works:
> - OVN-BGP agent introduction: 
> https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/openstack-networking-with-bgp/
> - How to set ip up on DevStack Environment: 
> https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/ovn-bgp-agent-testing-setup/
> - In-depth traffic flow inspection: 
> https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/ovn-bgp-agent-in-depth-traffic-flow-inspection/
> 
> We are thinking that possible next steps if community is interested could be 
> related to adding multitenancy support (e.g., through EVPN), as well as 
> defining what could be the best API to decide what to expose through BGP. It 
> would be great to get some feedback on it!
> 
> Cheers,
> Luis
> 
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:09 PM Dan Sneddon <dsned...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/10/21 2:09 PM, Sergey Chekanov wrote:
>> > I am looking to Gobgp (BGP implementation in Go) + go-openvswitch for 
>> > communicate with OVN Northbound Database right now, but not sure yet.
>> > FRR I think will be too heavy for it...
>> > 
>> > On 10.03.2021 05:05, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
>> >> You could look at it from a Free Range Routing perspective.  I've used 
>> >> it in combination with OVS for layer 2 and layer 3 handling.
>> >>
>> >> On 3/8/21 3:40 AM, Sergey Chekanov wrote:
>> >>> Hello!
>> >>>
>> >>> Is there are any plans for support BGP EVPN for extending virtual 
>> >>> networks to ToR hardware switches?
>> >>> Or why it is bad idea?
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> discuss mailing list
>> >>> disc...@openvswitch.org
>> >>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
>> >>
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > discuss mailing list
>> > disc...@openvswitch.org
>> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
>> > 
>> 
>> FRR is delivered as a set of daemons which perform specific functions. 
>> If you only need BGP functionality, you can just run bgpd. The zebra 
>> daemon adds routing exchange between BGP and the kernel. The vtysh 
>> daemon provides a command-line interface to interact with the FRR 
>> processes. There is also a bi-directional forwarding detection (BFD) 
>> daemon that can be run to detect unidirectional forwarding failures. 
>> Other daemons provide other services and protocols. For this reason, I 
>> felt that it was lightweight enough to just run a few daemons in a 
>> container.
>> 
>> A secondary concern for my use case was support on Red Hat Enterprise 
>> Linux, which will be adding FRR to the supported packages shortly.
>> 
>> I'm curious to hear any input that anyone has on FRR compared with GoBGP 
>> and other daemons. Please feel free to respond on-list if it involves 
>> OVS, or off-list if not. Thanks.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dan Sneddon         |  Senior Principal Software Engineer
>> dsned...@redhat.com |  redhat.com/cloud
>> dsneddon:irc        |  @dxs:twitter
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> disc...@openvswitch.org
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
> 
> 
> -- 
> LUIS TOMÁS BOLÍVAR
> Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat
> Madrid, Spain
> ltoma...@redhat.com   
>  
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> disc...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
> 
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to