Hi Ben, 

I have two questions,
1. When is this patch going to be released ? 
2. Do we have any documentation for building modules from patch?

On 28/06/21, 10:25 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <b...@ovn.org> wrote:

    I recommend trying the patches that I posted:
    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_pipermail_ovs-2Ddev_2021-2DJune_383783.html&d=DwIDaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=jK9phexdherJTNL6qWfkjyz7vNK2P5VYFIeRp9Vdy5s&m=0Y5dlQZ6-TXyNkmMDUiCUN6JaZJeIf_W69zr7CdJ_3A&s=7gXiz2Z8l7MPXHoqsyHwzyX4sozNLZM5RFJam3PSMRA&e=
 
    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_pipermail_ovs-2Ddev_2021-2DJune_383784.html&d=DwIDaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=jK9phexdherJTNL6qWfkjyz7vNK2P5VYFIeRp9Vdy5s&m=0Y5dlQZ6-TXyNkmMDUiCUN6JaZJeIf_W69zr7CdJ_3A&s=GZqZu8jql-ra0ik1wyfKSM4p6uNSvycyhJnMkTtIJTc&e=
 

    On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:24:06AM +0000, Saurabh Deokate wrote:
    > Hi Ben,
    > 
    > Here is the output for ovs-vsctl list controller 
    > 
    > [root@172-31-64-26-aws-eu-central-1c ~]# ovs-vsctl list controller
    > _uuid : eb56176a-ad32-4eb0-9cd8-7ab3bd448a68
    > connection_mode : out-of-band
    > controller_burst_limit: []
    > controller_queue_size: []
    > controller_rate_limit: []
    > enable_async_messages: []
    > external_ids : {}
    > inactivity_probe : 0
    > is_connected : true
    > local_gateway : []
    > local_ip : []
    > local_netmask : []
    > max_backoff : []
    > other_config : {}
    > role : other
    > status : {last_error="Connection refused", sec_since_connect="42606", 
sec_since_disconnect="42614", state=ACTIVE}
    > target : "tcp:127.0.0.1:6653"
    > type : []
    > 
    > Let me know if you need any other details.
    > 
    > ~Saurabh.
    > 
    > On 11/06/21, 4:03 AM, "Ben Pfaff" <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
    > 
    >     On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:51:58PM +0000, Saurabh Deokate wrote:
    >     > Hi Team,
    >     > 
    >     > We are seeing an issue in OVS 2.14.0 after moving from 2.8.0. We 
first set the controller on the bridge and then set inactivity probe for our 
controller to 0 to disable new connection attempts by ovs. After this we start 
our controller to serve request. But in the new version of OVS somehow we still 
see inactivity probe kicking in after every 5s and trying to reconnect. This 
issue is triggered when we are in the middle of handling a packet in our 
controller (i.e. OFController) which is blocked for almost 40s.
    >     > 
    >     > 
    >     > Kernel version: CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009
    >     > Output of ovs-vsctl list controller command shows inactivity_probe: 0
    >     > 
    >     > Below is the snippet from ovs-vswitchd.log
    >     > 
    >     > 
021-05-11T22:32:55.378Z|00608|rconn|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 
connected
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:05.382Z|00609|connmgr|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 44 
flow_mods 10 s ago (44 adds)
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:05.386Z|00610|rconn|ERR|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: no 
response to inactivity probe after 5 seconds, disconnecting
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:06.406Z|00611|rconn|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 
connecting...
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:06.438Z|00612|rconn|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 
connected
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:16.438Z|00613|rconn|ERR|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: no 
response to inactivity probe after 5 seconds, disconnecting
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:17.921Z|00614|rconn|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 
connecting...
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:18.108Z|00615|rconn|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 
connected
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:28.110Z|00616|rconn|ERR|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: no 
response to inactivity probe after 5 seconds, disconnecting
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:29.433Z|00617|rconn|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 
connecting...
    >     > 
2021-05-11T22:33:29.933Z|00618|rconn|INFO|br0.uvms<->tcp:127.0.0.1:6653: 
connected
    >     > 
    >     > 
    >     > Can you please help us find out what could be wrong with this 
configuration and what is the expected behaviour from ovs switch when the 
receiver on the controller is blocked for long.
    > 
    >     Hmm, I can't reproduce this with current OVS.  I do see a problem with
    >     the fail-open implementation; I'll see a patch for that.
    > 
    >     Can you show the output of "ovs-vsctl list controller"?
    > 

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to