On 9/3/21 9:10 PM, Odintsov Vladislav wrote: > We do use OOT module. > > Looks like it’s a bugfix and can be backported..?
I think it meets backport criteria, I sent a patch: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/[email protected]/ > > Regards, > Vladislav Odintsov Regards, Dumitru > > On 3 Sep 2021, at 19:05, Numan Siddique > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:24 AM Odintsov Vladislav > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Ilya, Dumitru, > > for some reason I’ve found your answer only today. > > From the link you’ve sent I see there is a patch in kernel OVS code, but > current OVS master still has old version (if (err == NF_ACCEPT && ct->status > & IPS_SRC_NAT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT)). > > Shouldn’t this fix be backported to OVS tree as well? > Can it solve my initial problem? > > Just in case, the error is next: > > 2021-09-03T14:41:42.960Z|00006|dpif(handler3)|WARN|system@ovs-system: execute > ct(commit,zone=1,label=0/0x1),set(tunnel(tun_id=0x1400160000f4,dst=<IP>,ttl=64,tp_dst=7471,flags(df|csum|key))),1 > failed (Invalid argument) on packet > tcp,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=<MAC1>,dl_dst=<MAC2>,nw_src=<IP1>,nw_dst=<IP2>,nw_tos=0,nw_ecn=0,nw_ttl=63,tp_src=54136,tp_dst=5432,tcp_flags=psh|ack > tcp_csum:206a > with metadata > skb_priority(0),skb_mark(0),ct_state(0x21),ct_zone(0x1),ct_tuple4(src=<IP1>,dst=<IP2>,proto=6,tp_src=54136,tp_dst=5432),in_port(4) > mtu 0 > > Thanks. > > > Do you use the OVS in-tree kernel module ? > > Please check out https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/NEWS#L159 > > OVS in-tree kernel module is deprecated. > > Thanks > Numan > > > > Regards, > Vladislav Odintsov > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
