Hey Brendan, On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:52 PM Brendan Doyle <brendan.do...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > So I have an underlay VIP that is reachable via a Gateway. The VIP moved > to a new > hypervisor after a simulated power failure (all hypervisors rebooted). > When things came > back OVN was resolving it to the wrong MAC address. When I looked in the > MAC_binding > table I saw that all entries for that address were wrong. I flushed the > table and everything > was fine (entries got updated with the correct MAC). > > So It seems to me that these entries must not be aged out? How is this > supposed to work? > These entries do not age out. We discussed the topic a couple of other times (eg. [0]) without a clear conclusion. Also, we observed that in certain environments the size of this table can increase to a point where the SB database starts to be huge (>1GB) mostly due to the entries in this table. To avoid this, we landed a patch in OpenStack recently that could be useful for you [1]. [0] https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2019-June/048936.html [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/813610 > > Thanks > > Brendan. > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > disc...@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
